One question: Would you say the same about getting completely naked in public?
One question: Would you say the same about getting completely naked in public?
It is against the law. That means that society, as a whole, has decided that this is immoral.
No one forces you to stare at the girl
So that means that its morally okay to kill everyone who looks at me (“No one forces then to look at me!”)?
Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t?
Because ethics are only enforcable through laws and the laws currently enforce “my” ethics in that regard.
Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)?
Whether that is morally right is an ethical question but would you say the same about a minor (exposing themselves)?
Ethics is very subjective
Exactly, so what is the issue with the company having moral concerns about it and shutting it down?
They are not taking away any money from the existing funds. And that is the important thing IMO. Rather, they are using that large amount of money and investing it (safely) so that they generate surplus money that they use. Hiwever, they arent taking away money that is currently there.
They are just using the interests that this frozen capital generates and using that (instead of continuing to pay the interests to the Russians).
(Their point was that Spotify’s free version is sufficient because they only want the things mentioned)
Bro, “Puritanism” is a religious movement of the 16-17th century. Maybe you mean purism?
(Serious) question: How do you stand not being able to select individual tracks? I honestly would rather listen to my music in any of the free frontend apps rather than being limited to that extent…
Honestly, what does this change? For paid users nothing, and the free version was always unusable with you not being able to individually select songs.
The US government doesn’t want an adversary government to have the data of its citizens (because of varios reasons, including mass manipulation for example). They would of course have no issue with having that data themselves though (also because then they would be more in control over how the data is handled).
But not for a foreign government (from their perspective).
What part is wrong then? That’s pretty nuch what they say in the article.
11-20 = -9 10-19 = -9 -9 = -9
Fixed that for you.
A 3rd party votes subtracts one vote from Biden’s total vote count, so to say. Here is the 1M$ math equation you desire (assuming you would usually vote for Biden):
Definitions:
(I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden
(II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + YourVote (Scenario where you vote for Biden)
(III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes (Scenario where you vote for a 3rd party)
Calculations:
(II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + Yourvote =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = EveryoneElsesVotes (III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = VotesBiden2
(I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden
VoteDifference1 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden1 VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden2
=〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - (VotesBiden1 - Yourvote) =〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump + YourVote - VotesBiden1 (!!!)
THUS WE CONCLUDE:
In scenario 2 (which is the one in which you vote for a 3rd party), the vote difference (which determines who won and by how much), is EQUIVALENT to one additional person voting for Trump. You’re welcome. I don’t even need the 1.000.000$.
If I understand this correctly, they are only using it to track terrorists who actively participated in a terror attack, right? What’s the big deal then…?
Depends on your country. Some just have lower tax rates depending on the item.
Would you think the same if the dad had told his buddy “500k € for the website”?
Lots of websites with menus on the left!
Can you send an example? I’ve only seen these foldout side bar menus.
No, the turn signals (“Blinker”) here in Germany have to be yellow.
No, you tried shifting the discussion and when I told you what was being discussed, you simply said you’re uninterested.
First, you’re taking the U.S. at its word that there was anyone on its side in real danger.
No I’m not. I never claimed anyone was in danger.
Second, it’s laughable to take the premise of additional intelligence possibly endangering some spy and turning that into “this would kill all U.S. spies.”
Yeah it is and nobody did. I certainly didnt.
Cocktails without alcohol cost way too much for what they are. That would be like paying 15 bucks for a burger without meat.
Restaurants sometimes also have like dozens of types of beer, wine, etc. but the best non-alcoholic they can do is a water or a coca cola softdrink?