Because it isn’t important how he would do the paperwork: alone or not. It must be done. And it is reasonable to expect the paperwork to be done.
Removed by mod
Depends on what documents he missed.
No idea. Some bureaucratic shit. He obviously lacked some papers.
Shouldn’t prosecutors care about forensics and laws, and not about the public’s mood?
Test it with a nail.
Continue…
I understand your position but it doesn’t work this way anymore for a century or something. Somewhere after the Imperialistic War the borders were closed around the world and people were forced into obligatory citizenship.
Modern law demands permission to cross a border.
Continue…
8 + 10 = ?
Removed by mod
Never heard about moderators?
The kid already showed his attitude by ignoring the law for 10 years. How did he appear in the country in the first place?
I said billionaires and prostitutes as billionaires escorted by prostitutes.
Your question is offtop. But if you insist: I’m not a fan of any kind of slavery regardless of place or time.
So you think that people younger than 18 should be granted live and work permission simply by the fact of their presence in the country? All documents should be dismissed for young people?
And why is it important? A bunch of posh billionaires gather in one place to… whatever they do on such gatherings.
If there was a bomb… That’ll be a completely different thing. But there is no bomb, just a bunch of billionaires and prostitutes.
You have objections against current USA laws demanding some paperwork to live, study and work in the country?
Yes, but not having proper paperwork doesn’t make you a good citizen. The kid had 10 years to make it right. He didn’t.
People are bad at democracy; that doesn’t surprise me. But that’s irrelevant. Laws are important. Plans, promises and hopes – are not.
So you think that everyone below 18 should be granted live permission regardless of anything?