Sarcasm is not lended to text very well. Can you understand that a state that makes a good law is a good thing and that nuance exists.
Sarcasm is not lended to text very well. Can you understand that a state that makes a good law is a good thing and that nuance exists.
That’s literally how the government was designed though. Do you believe that there should be a Constitutional amendment to protect porn and ease of subscription cancellation? I agree that the system is flawed, but a win here deserves to be celebrated even though there was a loss somewhere else.
Go here.
Go to the left side where it says Data & Privacy.
Scroll down to Data from apps and services you use
Under that is Third-party apps & services
Scroll down to Reddit
Click Delete all connections you have with Reddit
So a Democrat win in California shouldn’t be celebrated, because there’s an unrelated pointless Republican law in Texas? What are you on about?
You really think that half the humans on this planet make the conscious choice to destroy it every single day? That’s a pessimistic take if you ask me. People do what they have to to get by. Yes, there are small things that a lot of people could do to make a difference, but the leaders and capitalists that stand to make profit from destroying the Earth are the ones to blame. The consumer can demand changes, but until mandates motivate companies consumers are bound to buy things that they can afford. I’ve never been on a cruise because I think it’s terrible for the environment, and I only eat meat (chicken,turkey, or pork) once a day, but the train keeps barrelling on.
Not all humans. Just a small greedy portion
An even larger portion of America can’t afford them, so it doesn’t even matter.
And when Lina Kahn and the FTC is taken to the Supreme Court, they will give the FTC the final blow to overthrow any sort of government sanction.
What’s funny about book bans is that it assumes that anyone in these areas can read to be begin with. And that’s the problem.
I just said that I would not argue that. That means that I think the game play is different.
Ah, that makes sense. I wasn’t aware of the 20 year limit.
What about the dynamic of capturing wild monsters from all different biomes in a ball? Isn’t that relatively close Pokemon? Game play is different, but the dynamics are similar.
That’s a good point. They want to hurt them however they can.
I wouldn’t argue that the game play is different.
I don’t disagree with that, but the line that is drawn between inspiration and imitation is blurred and the courts will probably rule in favor of those with the most money, unfortunately.
You can either explain your position, or you can be a pretentious ass. Like I said before, I’m often wrong. I’m willing to hear your point, but you refuse to make it and act pompous.
It was wrong for Nintendo to copy someone, but it’s not wrong for Pocketpair to copy someone. That’s what you are saying?
Again, this isn’t a copyright lawsuit. Making a game with monsters that look similar to theirs is not what the lawsuit is about. It’s about patents. Likely design patents like I mentioned before. If I made a country song with Eminem’s lyrics, of course you wouldn’t confuse it with Slim’s music, but I would need his permission first.
So it was wrong for Nintendo to do that?
You’re being obtuse. I’m done here.