But in a response to her visa application, the Home Office told Ashkar that it had been denied on the grounds that granting it would “harm the public interest”, without giving any further reasons or explanation.
But in a response to her visa application, the Home Office told Ashkar that it had been denied on the grounds that granting it would “harm the public interest”, without giving any further reasons or explanation.
A third take: Authoritarian groups have been historically successful in wiping out (usually by force) less authoritarian groups and their methods of organizing.
If I was in politics or was looking to get into politics in the future, I would be trying to get arrested publicly for this. Look at the people who got arrested during the civil rights movement.
i are, I generally have to make about the corrections per message in order for it to even be legible
(left it in all its glory for you guys)
The nazi party used a lot of euphemism surrounding their genocide plan and a lot of german citizens claimed afterwards they didn’t know the extent of it (davon haben wir nichts gewusst), but the antisemitism was immediately visible obviously what with the kidnapping. The camps—a bit less so, but a lot of historians feel they were more of an open secret than a secret. It was definitely less globally visible than what’s happening in Palestine though and the international community was justifiably outraged when they saw the extent and brutality of the camps.
Wtf, breaches aside why would a health care company be working with advert companies?
It boggles my mind to think multiple humans in a boardroom somewhere okayed this at some point. For babies.
Related to bargaining, I read the wiki article on Iran’s nuclear program the other day and was surprised at how hard they are trying to do their nuclear program “by the book” while the US keeps blocking everyone else from agreeing that they’re entitled as long as they follow the guidelines (paris agreement etc).
~50% of the voters*
It would be interesting to look at generational differences in what people consider a splurge at the grocery store nowadays. Things like chips that didn’t used to be luxury priced cost $5-$6 dollars a bag now. I’ve always considered items more than about $4 (for individual items) to be expensive.
Things that I ate regularly that have drifted into “splurge” territory for me in the last few years:
-chips
-Veggie italian sausage
-Naked juice/bolthouse juice
-grapes
-chocolate chips
-pineapple juice
-potato bread
-salad dressing
-croutons
-yogurt
-cottage cheese
I always imagine it going:
Uni admin: “They’re approving kids for how much?! Well fuck $3000 a semester, let’s triple it!”
And now universities depend on that increased revenue and there’s no simple way to roll it back.
Somehow I don’t think insulting people is going to get them to want to participate in your shit show
I haven’t played around with them, are the new models able to actually reason rather than just predictive text on steroids?
Wow, I didn’t realize how many different groups ‘responded’
Right? The vast majority of religious people believe in ‘the god of Abraham,’ why can’t they get along?
Yeah god definitely waited until 1400 years ago to give out the -real- rules, and this made the list?
Oh no, how will people know if their opinions are right or wrong without our top most social ethicists?
At my first full time job my supervisor specified that I could hang up on anyone who brought up their lawyer, used abusive language, or brought up the BBB.
I’m on kbin so I only see upvotes:)
Good praxis