

Oh, I didn’t know that. Models were people have actually actively consented to their data being used for it (not “Wikipedia is CC so it’s fine”)?
Oh, I didn’t know that. Models were people have actually actively consented to their data being used for it (not “Wikipedia is CC so it’s fine”)?
we give, we take, we give again, and we are all in this together.
No, the AI megacorps only steal and then make you pay to use their illegal and unethical services. How naive is this?
I’m pretty sure it’s “open source” (as in not os, actually and probably trained on stolen data like always?)
Nice social engineering on the heist, one of the coolest things I’ve heard about Greenpeace in long time (which probability says more about mainstream media than Greenpeace?)
Yes, they’re one of the many (I think The Guardian does this as well?) media outlets in the UK that use “gender-critical” when they should use TERF / trans-hate (meaning they’re spineless cowards).
Depends on you definition of fine, I guess.
Is it because they’re enshittified af?
I think it’s much sadder (more sad? saddest) that people fall for such absurd douche bags. If they would at least be sexy and seem smart you could understand how people could be fooled but this is just too hard to watch.
Feel fee to use some shit where you can pay with your data and ads, then? No one is forcing you to use something people are giving to you for free.
Why would they, there’s nothing to gain for them in doing that, so they won’t. They only care about profit.