And a thousand free speech absolutists cried out ‘but now the Nazis won’t be publicly known!!!’

Nothing good has ever come from public gatherings of Nazis.

Cat 5 don’t fuck around.

Good luck Florida.

The only person that claims there was some kind of a relationship prior to the guy and girl meeting is the mother.

If there was any strong evidence to this story it would have been tested in court. The article specifically says that was not the case. Which means it’s basically heresay about his interest in her when she was 14.

This article just sensationalises that piece of information instead of focussing on the real crime which was a doctor giving his potentially addicted partner drugs.

Wow I’m feeling sorry for you my dude. You’re correct and everyone is too dense to read the article…infuriating.

Yep. He fucked up because he was in a relationship with an addict who he should not have supplied drugs to.

I lol’ed at that pic as well…

The night of broken glass is literally their guide book.

Why would this be surprising to anyone…

Trying to save their own ass from the young people who want to boot his ass off the throne.

No sane individual is going to pay for a subscription for phone backgrounds.

That is absolutely a stupid business idea and the people who came up with it should be publicly shamed.

It was when he called the rescue diver a paedophile that moment sticks out in my mind. But I have a feeling my opinion of him was changing before that.

I’d guess the hydraulic malfunctioned.

Communism is when you get free lunch.

Suck it you Venusian losers!

The particular industry that’s being nationalised is American flags produced for US government consumption. (The nationalisation part)

They’ve decided to legislate because they don’t like the optics of some foreign made products. (This isn’t an invisible hand; it’s opaque)

How is that justified in a supposedly capitalist society when China can produce flags of the same quality but at a cheaper price?

Edit: maybe protectionism is a better word than nationalise, end effect is the same; The government of a capitalist country is directly interfering with the market.

Capitalism. Until we don’t like particular ramifications of capitalism and then we legislate nationalisation of particular industries….because.

Truly the invisible hand of the market at work.

Yeah I probably should have, thanks for those links.

The existence of products designed to inject B12 is different to what I interpreted the person who I replied to was saying though.

I understood them as saying that farms are injecting B12 into animals so that meat gains some kind of nutrient that isn’t naturally occurring or not occurring at an appreciable level.

I have no doubt animals have all kinds of vitamin deficiencies and receive supplements to improve the over all health of the animal and the nutritional value of meat.

But is this the reason they are injecting B12?

Obviously I’ll read more on it.

EDIT: so the very first link basically confirmed what I just said, when an animal is deficient in B12 farmers inject it to make it more healthy. They aren’t injecting B12 into animals because animals just don’t have B12…

Yeah, when you link a source for your claim that people are injecting B12 into animals I’ll reengage with you.

I tried googling and got nothing.

Yeah what you’re describing is basically humans make morals.

The problem you should have with this is that currently society is fine with eating animal products.

Many societies were successful because they ate meat.

How do you reconcile a situation where you believe humans are the source of morals but you disagree with a particular moral created by humans I.e. that it’s ok to eat meat?

I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.

B12 is produced by microorganisms inside the guts of cows/ruminants.

They don’t inject B12 into animals as far as I know. Maybe you could link a source for that? First I’ve ever heard of it.

Vegans. Vegans are claiming there are moral facts when they say that I am wrong for consuming animal products.

Although I’ve had discussions with vegans who claim they aren’t moral realists, I can’t recall a satisfactory argument for a moral anti-realist vegan position.

If you’d like to offer one, please do.