I’m not gonna go hunting for it, but I’m pretty sure this has been studied and you’re spot on.

They call it: newsflation

Are you really asking why advertising that “the following comment may be hallucinated” nets you more downvotes than just omitting that fact?

You’re literally telling people “hey, this is a low effort comment” and acting flabbergasted that it gets you downvotes.

I feel like what makes the most sense and is likely what’s happening is that ChatGPT is being used to do the initial translation, and then a human is auditing that translation and making adjustments. So just a faster way to get the scaffolding and grunt-work out of the way.

It’s not irrelevant, it’s that you don’t actually know if it’s true or not, so it’s not a valuable contribution.

If you started your comment by saying “This is something I completely made up and may or may not be correct” and then posted the same thing, you should expect the same result.

Removed by mod

Knock knock

Is it?

Source?

It’s not even a majority of people.

It is false that 90% of the people you’ve met like Hitler.

You could dislike both.

One follows the other.

And yet you have no issue with the repetitive comment asking for a source instead of taking 3 seconds to Google. Isn’t that weird?

It’s not though. He’s clearly trying to motivate non-voters to get out and vote for him, saying he’ll fix everything if they give him another term, and then they can go back to not voting.

Like I said, there’s plenty of actual insane, vile things he’s actually said. No need to make things up.

He’s said plenty of crazy shit, no need to invent things.

What would you prefer?

For someone to take 3 seconds to Google something before asking for a source. Why is that so controversial?

I don’t think a comment asking for a source is very interesting conversation.

Annnnnd ignoring the genuine discussion, just like before.

You’re so disgustingly disingenuous.

Annnnnnnd the party of shithead losers loses!

In case anyone else is thinking of blindly parroting this spoonfed talking point, you should know that

Research in Canada and the United States has found no evidence that MMPs have deterred crime; rather, some studies suggest that MMPs can result in overly harsh penalties and disparities, that they increase costs to the criminal justice system as a result of higher levels of incarceration, and that lengthier sentencing may actually increase recidivism

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2017001/article/54844-eng.htm

If you’d like to see this nonsense further dismantled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_O3_yyTqgE