DreamButt

In this case? Pretty easily with the right data. Though I think an opinion poll would be more interesting

So I’m not an expert but my understanding is the flow is roughly:

1. Available memory gets low
2. Compress based on LRU rules
3. Use swap
4. OOM

So it’s more meant to be preventative afaik

No, but that’s an interesting question. Ultimately it probably comes down to hardware specs. Or depending on the particular bot and it’s env the spec of the container it’s running in

Even with macos’s style of compressing inactive memory pages you’ll still have a hard cap that can be reached with the same technique (just with a larger uncompressed file)

Who cares about the city? The things that actually matter:

• specs
• Quality of the chip

Are these things worth $400? Hell no. But I still don’t think this is a good comparison.

Come on Spokane ur better than this

Honestly they were better until recently. GPT (at least) has gotten really good at de-escalation and providing (mostly) factual responses when you get irate

the article is talking about how they could have a booming ad business but at present have little to none

The Cupertino tech giant is not an advertising company, however. Chatterjee notes that Apple’s decision to only show a single Search Ad in its App Store could limit the revenue opportunity relative to his prior expectations.

I swear people use to love him. What happened?

Gods below

Nice try big data. U aren’t getting my email that easily!

Oh it’s about tariffs

Ur parents have good DNA?

Idk what they’re on about. The five day for NASDEQ is basically 0% rn

I like my team. I don’t mind meetings

Leave room for the saddle

Well sure, but it’s also good to give you a rundown on various patterns and options. Like any tool it’s only as good as the wielder

Quotation marks denote a “quotation”

GitHub has slowly become an advertising platform for repos more than anything. I miss what it was just a couple of years ago. It did exactly what you needed when you needed it. Now it’s just so bloated

That’s in the book :)

Is it simpler tho? You have to explain to someone that the Type is also an Object with the field .class on it. I feel like just saying it’s a Type and you can reference Types directly is simpler. Idk maybe I’ve been currupted by type theory too much lol