These sentences:
Average weekly earnings went up from $1016 to $1236, a 21.6% increase. That’s come up short on the 23.4% inflation in that time period.
answer the implicit question in this sentence:
People can complain about how the economy isn’t working for regular people, but the last 5 years were actually a pretty good run for wage earners.
It wasn’t really a good run. Wages didn’t keep up with inflation. Even though wages are higher, the buying power with those wages is less.
Right, sure. At which point, pointing out that “double jeopardy doesn’t apply” is kind of just needless pedantry.
You know, I thought that too at one point, but if the defendant’s lawyer is trying to use double jeopardy to get this incredibly high profile, publicly scrutinized case thrown out, we should just sit down, shut up, and listen to the professionals
Not that I think you’re wrong, but having him wear a bulletproof vest, handcuffs, and shackles on his ankles any time he’s transported/shown off in public is gonna make that story real hard to buy
Not in English they aren’t. I presume you can tell this sign is in English.
He’s trying to destroy the country. Amassing as many bruises as possible is the point.
A little display or indicator light somewhere on the toilet itself would be better than connecting it to some IOT app
Yeah I’d much rather spread poo particles all over my smartphone instead
God dammit, the ads finally found their way to Lemmy
Eh, I think that in the context handling classified information, it’s fair to say Signal is “insecure”, purely because anyone with a phone number can have an account, and can be accidentally added to sensitive conversations.
You know, like the exact thing that happened in this article.
Not that that’s Signal’s fault. But the fact that it’s even possible makes Singnal unusable for handling classified information.
Well, see, the thing is that it 100% absolutely positively no-questions-about-it does warrant a meeting and government approved, Internet-disconnected communications methods.
The fact that Trump’s entire fucking cabinet apparently disagrees is what concerns me.
Depending on how many layers of abstraction you have, your app may not have access to the raw HTTP response.
That sounds like either over-abstraction or bad abstraction then
And also the copious use of steroids (without any accompanying resistance training), which makes him look like a sweaty bag of manure on legs
Well how else do you expect them to keep the peace?
my hard drive overheated
So, this means they either have a local copy on disk of whatever database they’re querying, or they’re dumping a remote db to disk at some point before/during/after their query, right?
Either way, I have just one question - why?
Edit: found the thread with a more in-depth explanation elsewhere in the thread: https://xcancel.com/DataRepublican/status/1900593377370087648#m
So yeah, she’s apparently toting around an external hard drive with a copy of the “multiple terabytes” large US spending database, running queries against it, then dumping the 60k-row result set to CSV for further processing.
I’m still confused at what point the external drive overheats, even if she is doing all this in a “hot humid” hotel room that she can’t run any fans I guess because her kids were asleep?
But like, all of that just adds more questions, and doesn’t really answer the first one - why?
They were a relatively cheap, healthy, reliable source of protein. Also, they’re delicious.
Nah what you’re doing is textbook gaslighting. Not to mention, putting words in my mouth. You wanna have a level headed conversation, I’m down, but if you’re gonna continue to let emotion take over, I’m out.
Your weird attempts at gaslighting aren’t working dude
Hey why do you think they call it “grave” danger