Amazon could soon be on the hook for safety of third-party products it sells and ships — Government order could classify it as a distributor, potentially exposing it to more legal claims::undefined

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the correct way to jump is to flip your main so you’re disconnected. I’m probably talking out of my ass tho.

      I don’t own a generator nor have the need. Just basing this on what I’ve seen in the wild.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The more correct way is to install a switch that does that, so you can be connected to the grid or to the generator, not both. It’s basically what you said, but it doesn’t trust users to remember to do it correctly

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It does, there’s even automatic ones so you can have the generator kick in after a second or two without power and shut off when the grid comes back up

            I watched a video on it a week or two ago, I think the general term would be an interlock

      • fkn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, in theory that would work. But they actually make main disconnect switches for this in the event that the main breaker fails. It’s a mandatory install in all grid tie electrical generator systems (including solar).

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I keep hearing this as the “Reason” but never backed by anything that makes sense. I’ve never needed to jump my generator to my house, and don’t particularly care to even in the event of “disaster” so don’t attack me like I’m doing this…

      If you successfully suicide jumper your generator to the grid. Wouldn’t the collective load of all your neighbors stuff kill the generator? (eg bog it down to the point that it turns off? [if it has no breaker]) Also wouldn’t the load of literally your whole neighborhood trip off the breaker in the generator(or in the panel)? Doesn’t this leave it as the only “risk” is if you happen to turn on the generator as the lineman themselves are specifically holding a live wire with an active connection to a ground/neutral before the previous stuff can happen? Or only if they happen to isolate you and then you turn on the genny after? Wouldn’t you agree that this last thing would be an incredibly rare?

      And I can never find an article where a cable was determined to be the cause of an electrocution…

      Now because the internet is the internet… I’m not advocating for using suicide cables… There’s much easier reasons why this is a terrible idea (exposed live contacts being literally the primary one). But I just never understood the “lineman” argument with all the stuff that would have to go specifically “right” in order to do that kind of harm to a lineman.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Look into it more. It’s incredibly common, and the voltage from a small generator in your yard, yes in theory, could leak to neighbors. However electricity follows the shortest path to ground. So if your home is drawing it, you will basically prevent that leakage. If you do fire it up, but use nothing, you may partially leak current to your neighbors (and potentially be liable for damages if your little backyard Honda or generac has a power spike at some point)

        And the danger to to the linemen doing repair isn’t the voltage necessarily (house current of 120v is not remotely high enough amperage to cause instant death. You can stick a fork in an outlet and try it) it is that you may suddenly electrify lines they are working on while suspended. If you charge the line, maybe you shock them and they have an accident. Or worse, your charged line creates enough of a charge differential that during the repair the much higher voltage electricity they have not isolated yet may bridge the air gap because you’ve energized the “dead” side prematurely.

        In reality, most electricians and linemen are careful of this because of this exact reason. But it did harm a few people before moron’s use of these things became common knowledge. Prior to these kinds of cables being commonly marketed for this, a lineman could hop up and reconnect you faster because there was an assumption they had full control of the current pathways. Now that’s a toss up. This isn’t a recent thing either, but it’s becoming more common.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              https://up.codes/viewer/puerto_rico/ibc-2018/chapter/27/electrical

              And doesn’t adhere to US electrical code.

              Virtually all latin american countries are third world. Puerto Rico is latin american.

              Their own people say it’s third world. https://www.abc57.com/news/only-on-puerto-rican-businessman-says-home-is-third-world-country

              The US is by definition not a third world country.

              Depends on the definition. Originally used to simply describe the participants of WW2 and the cold war… Since the cold war, it’s definition has more aligned with economics and industrialization rather than simply what side a country was on during a war. It’s clear by my use of the term that I meant the modern definition, especially since we’re talking in 2024… and not in 1989.

              https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/third-world-countries

              The modern definition of Third World

              However, the meaning of Third World changed after the fall of the Soviet Union (and the end of the Cold War) in the early 1990s. “Third World” lost its political root and came to refer to economically poor and non-industrialized countries, as well as newly industrialized countries. Under this modernized definition, Third World countries are those that display economic, social, political, and environmental issues such as high poverty rates, economic instability, and lack of essential human resources compared to the rest of the world.

              This shifting definition has led to significant confusion as to which countries could correctly be called Third World today. For example, going by the historical definition, nations such as Finland, Sweden, Ireland, and Switzerland were not aligned with either NATO or the Communist Bloc, and so were Third World countries. However, all four countries are economically prosperous today, and as such would not be considered Third World under the current modern definition of the term.

              Adding insult to inaccuracy, when used in its modern context, Third World is considered to be a derogatory term that degrades countries which are developing and/or poor. This combination of confusion and disrespect has made Third World a largely obsolete term.

              Under the “new” definition many parts of the USA could be considered third world, but I’m not going to argue that.

              But fine, I’ll modify my statement here…

              Puerto Rico is a third world commonwealth.

              Nobody… and I mean NOBODY has yet to address the actual electrical engineering part of my question. Instead we’ve gone off the political bullshit bandwagon. So I’m just going to take it that I’m correct, and that the original premise is bullshit.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Nobody… and I mean NOBODY has yet to address the actual electrical engineering part of my question. Instead we’ve gone off the political bullshit bandwagon. So I’m just going to take it that I’m correct, and that the original premise is bullshit.

                Reads like:

                Nobody… and I mean NOBODY (i.e. the fifteen people that have seen my posts on Lemmy) has yet to falsify my claim that I’m the second coming of Jesus. So I’m just going to take it that I’m correct, and you can kiss my holy, demi-god ass.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  And the fact that you still keep addressing items not on topic simply shows that you’re a dickwad. What’s your point? I’ve made a reasoned argument. You’ve addressed nothing yourself except make really dumb platitudes.

                  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I’m not interested in the question you posed, and I doubt you’re sincerely interested in it either as you’ve spent all of your time worrying about Lemmy replies rather than taking a single step outside of whining to get it answered.

                    Edit: You’re sitting there with basically all of humanity’s knowledge at your disposal and you’re like, nah, if the randos in this completely unrelated thread don’t address my concerns about electrical code it means that my hunches are correct. This is you —> 🤡