• AlecSadler@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      $20 one time for a well developed app that I use multiple hours a day is inexpensive.

      I pay almost as much to multiple streaming services PER MONTH for a shitty experience and sometimes not a completely ad-free experience.

      Anyway, in all honesty I chose the $1.99/mo because it gives the dev $24/yr into perpetuity. I also donate to instances. I also use Connect and Jerboa and Liftoff. It’s whatever.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      God forbid you have to can pay for stuff if you want.

      It’s a third party app. One of many. With an optional purchase to support the dev. Honestly…

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt anyone who says this has donated to their Lemmy instance.

      The truth is, humans try to justify their purchases. You didn’t want to pau for Sync, you would have happily used it for free.

      You want to feel good for having paid for Sync.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      God forbid you have to pay for stuff.

      But reddit asking to be paid for use of their API was the end of the world for these devs lol

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, reddit demanded ludicrously high fees at barely 30 days notice. It gave nobody any time at all to figure out alternative monetization strategies. Many of the third party apps had expressed their willingness to pay, but that was just absurd

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of these apps had subscriptions already in place. All they had to do was remove the free access and maybe increase the subscription price a bit to $5/month (I’m not sure what they were charging before).

          • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They also had ads, which they’d no longer gain revenue from. Ads can pull in $3-5 per month per user. That’s a massive loss.

                • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Apart from the ones that pay. You only need to look at any of the sync posts on here to see there are many, many of them.

                  • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Ad revenue very often dwarfs the income from subscribing users by a huge margin. Sure, a single user subscribing pays for themselves plus a little extra, but your free users make up 70-80% of your revenue