• hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Certainly correct, we still need a path to direct action and it needs to be everywhere.

    • daemoz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technology isn’t going to save humanity. Greatly reducing population size by limiting reproduction is the only chance for a long future for humans. Thats the most direct path, but also at odds with all of our forms of government and economics. China couldt afford to keep doing it and they understand this. Its the same with the earths ecology. We would need a massive enlightening and there are far too many material and lifestyle choices and campaigns to sway people away from our staus quo. Humanity is doomed by human greed and jealousy, it always was. But thats fine, once you come to terms with it, and if you caught it before having kids, its a pretty freeing understanding.

        • daemoz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          you are wrong, nowhere am I advocating for anything. I’m saying human overpopulation will lead to our doom. This response is why I don’t really care about sustainability anymore. I’m not having kids, feel free to keep your head buried in the sand. Asshat

      • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        the only reduced population size that’s needed is the population of plutocrats, the rest of us will be fine