• MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The problem with PassKey is simply that they made it way more complicated.

    Anyone who has worked with SSH keys knows how this should work, but instead companies like Google wanted to ensure they had control of the process so they proceeded to make it 50x more complicated and require a network connection. I mean, ok, but I’m not going to do that lmao.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      Would love for you to describe exactly how it’s more complicated. From my perspective I click a single button and it’s set up. To log in I get a notification on my device, I click a button and I’m logged in.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        they must have meant technically complicated, which is also meaningful in consumer technology.
        like if it’s true that it requires an internet connection, that’s quite bad, partly because of yet another avenue for possible tracking, and what if the service you want to access is not on the internet, but the passkey doesn’t work without it still

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Private keys on an anonymous, untraceable smartcard. PIN or Matching-on-card fingerprint for the second factor Everything else can go directly into the garbage bin