Summary

A European Parliament member claimed that the U.S. gave Europe three weeks to agree on Ukraine’s “surrender” terms or risk an American withdrawal from Europe.

Mika Aaltola made the claim on X, but provided no evidence. NBC News reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested a U.S. troop reduction in Europe.

Trump reportedly plans to cut 20,000 troops and demand greater NATO contributions. He has pushed for higher NATO defense spending.

Trump may meet with Putin soon, believing Russia holds the upper hand in negotiations.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Military bases and soldiers are the opposite of soft power

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Eh, it’s at least hybrid. Classic hard power is the use of the military. That can include garrisoning but usually by force, not by permission.

    • Peck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you think about it from position of China being the biggest threat, then only Asian bases and countries matter. That’s why we don’t hear much about Trump doing crazy things in that region.

      While Europe is important, it should be able to fend for itself. Also Europe joining China is unlikely in short and mid term. So it make sense to spend less money on Europe and focus on Asia.

      Also explains the Russia situation. Although culturally Russia is as European as Sweden and Germany, this war has pushed it closer to China than ever. If the conflict lasts longer, then their alignment would be immenent. Personally I’m surprised that they didn’t align more. China was being surprisingly passive about the whole thing.

      • 00x0xx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        If the conflict lasts longer, then their alignment would be immenent.

        Indeed. I do think this is why the US is seeking to end the war quickly.

        Personally I’m surprised that they didn’t align more. China was being surprisingly passive about the whole thing.

        China’s policies is for long term military and economic growth without the use of foreign alliance. The PRC doesn’t like to take risks when they don’t have to, and a rapid military alliance with Russia will come with plenty of risks that the Chinese might want to avoid.

        • Peck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes China makes big distinction between US and Europe in its rhetoric. And they are working on pulling Europe from USA, but it’s early days and it will take time. Lots of time.

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think Trump will manage to push Europe into China’s arms well within the next 4 years at the rate he’s going. If Europe can get China to back Ukraine I think that’s all it would take at this time.

        • Peck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think so. They are culturally too different. Europe will continue to suck American cock for at least couple decades going forward. That’s not to say that economic ties won’t increase in the meantime.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          China has announced today it supports the peace talks started by the US and Russia.

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            china backs whoever is likely on the winning side that benefits them, right now trump is useful to china. also helps if russia weakening as a power as well, china and russia are frenemies at best.