cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoAngry, disappointed users react to Bluesky's upcoming blue check mark verification systemwww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down121
arrow-up1379arrow-down1external-linkAngry, disappointed users react to Bluesky's upcoming blue check mark verification systemwww.neowin.netcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareMangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up54arrow-down7·18 hours agoNope, it’s 100% centralized.
minus-squarelone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·11 hours agoIt’s 100% centralized, but with the ability to be decentralized. Sorta like Threads before they started federating
minus-squareMangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·5 hours agoSure, but until it actually gets used significantly in that way, we might as well just say it’s centralized.
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 hours agoThe “ability” to decentralize has costs that scale quadratically. So in every practical sense, it cannot be decentralized. At best it could have a few servers that participate.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·13 hours agoThis is a little bit more black and white compared with the other responses. 🙈
Nope, it’s 100% centralized.
It’s 100% centralized, but with the ability to be decentralized. Sorta like Threads before they started federating
Sure, but until it actually gets used significantly in that way, we might as well just say it’s centralized.
The “ability” to decentralize has costs that scale quadratically. So in every practical sense, it cannot be decentralized. At best it could have a few servers that participate.
This is a little bit more black and white compared with the other responses. 🙈