A court in Romania has rejected a request by influencer Andrew Tate to return assets that were seized during investigations into the case in which he is charged with human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.
I have no idea what their standards are, but if I were running the company I would deplatform someone convicted of human trafficking when their videos are basically justification for human trafficking.
Also he isn’t convicted yet.
Does YouTube only deplatform people who have been convicted of a crime?
I have no idea what their standards are, but if I were running the company I would deplatform someone convicted of human trafficking when their videos are basically justification for human trafficking.
I’m glad you would, but that wasn’t what I was asking about.
I answer what you’re asking about in the first 4 words
If you have no idea then what does this comment mean?
I’m not exactly looking for snark just some clarification to your comment.
It’s an internet forum, and I’m tossing out plausible reasoning YouTube might have.
Thanks for letting me know what I’m commenting on, have a nice day or night.