Pre-war refers to anything built before the ²nd Time War of 2208. If you want more information give me a few weeks and we can talk about it more last week.

In the realm of unsafe looking links: this is the link that all others shall be judged by.

Oh man that’s gold…

The only minority I’m ignoring is you if you are one because you’re a fucking idiot.

When you have to take Olympic sized leaps to make your argument sound better you have to know you done fucked up.

Because they don’t want people making fake versions of government sites. If someone accidentally thinks the fake site is real it can cause serious harm.

Fro a quick glance this article is almost entirely from anonymous sources, one of the few exceptions seems to be… a Russian news agency, so I’m gonna go ahead and take this with a grain of salt.

Can we please deport him to Canada?

Wow, they’re using Artificial Intelligence to do the same thing predictive analytics has been doing for over 50 years, what a time to be alive!

In this scene he’s in prison on Asgard. Can you imagine what he’s done just for a cup of Asgardian Battle Juice or whatever they call it?

No offense but I kinda feel like you know what I meant when I said “general” discrimination laws, as in “existing discrimination laws”.

From some quick googling “The California law bars discrimination on the basis on ancestry. Dalit lawyers believe that caste discrimination is covered under it. Legal scholars have also argued that caste discrimination is cognizable as race discrimination, religious discrimination and national origin discrimination.”

Like I said originally, I don’t see why specifying caste would be an issue. This hasn’t been tested in court in CA yet but clearly we can see why the argument is being made that existing laws already cover it.

Someone elsewhere in the thread pointed out the US doesn’t acknowledge caste at all, so maybe that’s why they don’t want to codify caste discrimination as that alone could lend credence to caste even being a thing.

But as you pointed out USA doesn’t acknowledge caste, so specifying caste discrimination would be bad, so making sure it can be prosecuted under the “general” discrimination laws makes more sense, doesn’t it?

Like I said, I don’t see the harm in spelling it out even if it is superfluous, it does make me wonder if he vetoed it for another reason and doesn’t want to say.

Sure, but I’d love to hear a smart lawyer use a governor’s statement while arguing before a jury.

All men are equal, it’s just that some are more equal than others /sarcasm

Exactly. It would be pretty stupid for a governor to say existing laws already apply when they don’t, but I don’t exactly trust any politician to tell the truth unless it’s politically expedient for them.

Do we know that? Is there case law?

I don’t know, that’s where we would need a CA lawyer to chime in. Obviously that’s where this issue could go either way.

There will always be a lawyer who will use any ridiculous argument to get their client off, that is literally their function. By the same argument the opposing counsel can point to the governors statement that other laws should be applicable, can’t they?