Are these cases required to go to a state court before they’re presented federally?
While it’s good to know, It feels like it’s not relevant whether an individual state’s courts argue it, since foreign policy has to be handled on a federal level.
edit: I’m actually confused. It’s a federal court in California? what sway does it have typically?
It’s probably because I generally saw the sub shutdowns as a result of the protest, and not as an ongoing protest. Reddit clearly wasn’t in any talks with the mods at that point and vica versa.
Honestly i’ll just go with it being months. I’m basically just arguing semantics at this point.
I mean, I remember it being weeks myself.
But it’s not as if things went back to the way they were either. There were definitely effects due to those weeks.
It wasn’t the right argument is the issue. Like only the last thing he ever said was directly saying CPC.
Like if thats what we wanted to find out we clearly got the wrong person to ask it.
What is the formatting used to denote strikethrough on lemmy? On Kbin it looks like it’s ignoring it, but it has double tilde as a supported strikethrough formatter.
I mean, Russia flubbed so hard the whole world saw it.
Israel clearly has the arsenal everyone thought Russia did.
What makes you think the killing will stop?
If your reason is “Because they will be dead”, then I think you have your answer.
Polio is also mandatory for life if you get it.
Whats so complicated about probability?
Probably that it is at the end of the day still chance, and once it happens it happens.
Almost all people who didn’t vaccinate against covid are still alive and well you know.
Pretty sure that’s wrong.
People take a risk either way. Taking the vaccine or not taking it.
You’re also taking a risk to take the disease head-on or not. Side effect of Covid include
-Excessively high fever
-Weakness
-Potential risk of Long Covid
-Fucking death
All that research and none of it towards how much the vaccine wouldn’t have affected you huh? Well just don’t pass it off to the next generation you POS.
Pretty sure most people think of Covid, the thing a lot of people did die to, or Polio, the returning sickness that we literally had a president who couldn’t walk because of.
Fun part being we’re having life-debilitating diseases (again, polio) come back from the results of the anti-vax rhetoric.
So you’ve never been truly sick is all that means. Just means you’ll die when you have a truly dangerous sickness and don’t take any precautions for it.
All of which would still apply to Elon Musk. No way the guys open sourcing his microchips.
A lot of medicines have side effect. And a lot of side effects. But you still take them because The thing you’re taking them for fucking sucks
There’s being careful and there’s forgetting the whole point of it all: to not get a life-debilitating sickness. Which a lot of vaccines eliminate.
Didn’t the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn’t that less than a year ago? I can’t imagine this going well.
Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they’re bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.
To be fair in Epsteins case his testifying could’ve probably put some people behind bars. This guy won’t have anymore information now that he’s been pulled away from the system.
deserves the maximum punishment
I literally said the punishment didn’t fit though.
He really shouldn’t. What the guy did was still legally wrong, and he probably knew it and weighed he would rather take jail time and commit it. A less scrupulous person could do worse things, which is why those laws are in place.
If he could somehow reduce the sentence that would be great, and if that is on the table he should, but some punishment should still occur.
He’s a vigilante hero for what he did, but vigilantes are still criminals. The main issue here is that the punishment is clearly wrong, and the message is wrong, as the judge seems to think this is paramount to treason, which it isn’t.
So the judge is in with trump. Hope none of his cases go that guys way.
Like yeah, he broke the law and needed to be punished. But it wasn’t government secrets, which i’m pretty sure is already legally coded separately from this guys crimes, and also neither of which are treason, which would be the capital attack.
So the guy blatantly spoke against his own legal experience for a political swing.
Thanks for the clarification