Cross the veil of reality and walk into strange beautiful worlds where chaos shall coalesce back into order.

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle


  • I’m not thoroughly aware of their dealings, but these amounts of private investment aren’t going to pay for themselves. If you raise 100 million, investors typically want a billion back, or more.

    From the looks of it, Bitwarden might’ve tried to go with the Open Source model to get free development resources, trust (because it’s an open source PASSWORD manager), and general goodwill. But now that they’ve deemed that got enough of a market share (or investors are starting to breathe down their necks), it’s time to start raising the walled garden.

    Even if they claim after the fact that it was a “Bug” that the client couldn’t be built without their proprietary sdk. The very fact one exists is a bad enough sign, specially when its influence is spreading.

    VC is a devil’s bargain. Raising VC money is NEVER a good sign.



  • One very much agrees, the ideals of socialism are certainly interesting. The current model is a bit of a joke, but it is the world we live in, and we have to shift from the status quo if strive towards other ways of doing things.

    But moreover, if the system isn’t owned by an organized body whose members chosen by the people. Then who owns it? Who operates it? Who makes the calls on what decisions ought to be made? The people can demand change, but someone needs to heed that change and delegate workers to do the change.

    Modern governments (mainly democracies), in THEORY are supposed be a representative of the people. The people vote for politicians that supposedly want the same they do. Law is written, bodies are created and demolished and so the wheels of society spin.

    Problem is that accumulation of wealth opens the door by buying the mouths of democracy. If you have friends in mass media, half the work is already done. Humans are lazy and unlikely to act upon politics unless they are directly threatened (and even then, not that frequently)

    Again, I agree. It’s just hard to picture a different world. Power generally works best when it’s distributed, but how exactly it’s destributed is critically important, as well as the mechanisms that ensure that it its purpose is not so easily perverted.


  • This is actually an interesting proposal. In fact, many utilities went the way of nationalization like water and electricity. Searching the internet, socializing and ensuring a fair market are all also things which could in theory be nationalized given they fulfill a basic need.

    Of course, as they are, they would grant whichever government they were given untold power over the entire internet and our lives. Which seems rather… unbalanced. Moreover, no government should retain that right given the internet transcends borders. No one owns all of it.

    Letting the free market run its course with no breaks clearly didn’t work particularly well either.

    Perhaps a third option? Instead of one government ruling all of it. Perhaps they were to be owned by a supranational body where several governments can propose and discuss changes/regulation and keep balances on each other? UN style? Worthy of discussion.

    If anyone has other ideas I’d love to hear them.

    PS: (Also, when one suggests nationalizations such as this, one does not intend for a nationalized framework to be the ONLY one. Alternatives brought upon by the free market would still certainly compete with any such services.)





  • I’ve already tried Linux several times over the years. My problems were mainly poor program compatibility and RTX card related driver issues for the latest attempt. At the time I couldn’t afford to change since critical work related programs did not run at all properly on Linux. Albeit that has changed in time. Also, because of the AI craze, NVIDIA has finally shipped decent drivers to linux land.

    What prevents me most nowadays is mainly having to setup everything, which I’d rather do once when upgrading the whole system. The Power User moat has been filling over time and the confy guys upstairs are non the wiser.





  • Still saves a ton of time from learning from either somewhat related tutorials. Garbage courses. Or digging through the modern spam infested web.

    It’s a decent tutor, never said that it’s perfect. I will not hesitate that using it as an assistant has bumped up my productivity and learning by roughly 50% when it comes to programming.

    Of course, it has it’s myriad problems, specially in bleeding edge fields like AI development with libraries iterating sometimes nightly. As well as it’s trend to not exactly teach, but instead answer your specific question. So you still need to have some initiative and still rely on a few human resources.


    HOWEVER, I do agree that blindly copy pasting code from an AI is a TERRIBLE idea. And all the buzz about AI developers seems like a disaster waiting to happen (and it certainly will!).



  • I initially thought about installing UBlacklist on Firefox and block the spam, but then I had a thought? Let us do the HouseFresh.com test on Duck Duck Go and see how far up it is?

    Apparently, Housefresh.com stands behind world famous Air Purifier reviewers like:

    • Best Buy
    • popular mechanics
    • CBSnews
    • NationalGeographic
    • PCMagazine
    • Rollingstone
    • Yahoo
    • UsNews
    • Forbes
    • Choice
    • MrGadget.com.au
    • CNET
    • Amazon
    • TopConsumerReviews
    • Bustle
    • ConsumerReports
    • Parents
    • Health
    • bhg
    • thekitchn
    • rd
    • learnmetrics
    • homedepot
    • iheartdogs
    • telegraph
    • msn
    • livestrong
    • sethlui
    • nytimes
    • reviewed.usatoday
    • popsci
    • oransi
    • healthline
    • seattleweekly
    • bestreviews
    • thesprucepets
    • tomsguide
    • gearhungry
    • consumertestedreviews
    • bobvila
    • prevention
    • nbcnews
    • nypost
    • foodandwine
    • consumeradvice.in
    • news.com.au
    • esquire
    • gq
    • wsj
    • verywellhealth
    • consumerreports
    • moderncastle
    • consumeranalysis
    • independent.co.uk
    • hollywoodreporter
    • hgtv
    • consumersadvocate
    • thehindu
    • toptenreviews
    • people.com
    • popsci
    • money
    • endadget
    • businessinsider
    • gearpatrol
    • trustedreviews
    • digitaltrends
    • menshealth
    • howtogeek
    • techyearlab
    • nymag
    • livescience
    • portugal(what?)
    • nj
    • iqair
    • mashable
    • billboard
    • prevention
    • techhive
    • architecturaldigest
    • huffpost
    • reviewed.usatoday
    • realsimple
    • techradar
    • wired

    Well, nevermind guess. I can have either HouseFresh and literally nothing else. Or an ocean of spam, intermixed with the rare human written article that was produced by the main branch of the publisher, rather than its SEO garbage chute.

    The web search is a lost cause. No wonder Kagi keeps growing in popularity.

    (Also keep in mind, in that giant list? Some of those websites are so GOOD at their Air Purifying review job that they get to be featured more than once, thrice even at times)



  • Long story short:

    • They pledge to keep the status quo. (IE perpetual licenses in new versions)
    • Development is going to speed up.
    • Subscriptions are 99% coming. (Albeit optional at least at the start)
    • Free in schools. (IE training new artists in the Canva ecosystem. So they can be milked later. Here’s a personal anecdote: Maya, the paid 3D alternative to Blender is free in schools. Come out of school and it’s 235$ a month)

    &

    • Now throw all those pledges out because words mean nothing. This is not a partnership, this is an acquisition, and unless the contract is provided for us, in writing of the agreed upon terms. Nothing else matters but the actions that we’ll see in the near future.

  • ArkyonVeil@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoTechnology@lemmy.worldAffinity is joining the Canva family
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sigh… Why…? Why is it too hard? Why is it that in this day and age, we can’t simply have something we pay for and keep with no worries. Once I started owning software, Affinity was my choice. They had a long track record of not selling out, retaining high standards and a fairly priced transaction.

    You pay for good software, the company works hard to make the software better, and then sells you a better version that you can upgrade at your own choice. Plain, simple and honest.

    Nothing lasts in this day and age.

    You used to be something Serif, but now you’re in the big leagues along with Adobe, and against them you’re nothing.

    Undramatic PS: Affinity Designer is damn solid, like it more than big A’s Illustrator, shame I’m now afraid of pressing the update button >:(

    EDIT:

    Speculative decision thoughts

    Apparently in 2022 when V2 came out, they made triple of what they expected and that number was something like 10-20 million pounds. Even though it sounds like a lot, it might have not been enough.

    After blowing off some steam to think clearly, there is the chance that Affinity might’ve been sinking and hoping for a payday. They have always been a couple steps behind Adobe and . Whenever Adobe makes a new feature they brag about it from the mountains as they got the R&D cash to power those, while Affinity is churning along just polishing their software. This makes it hard to sell at a glance, also FOSS alternatives are getting stronger. So their new user aquisition probably hasn’t been great.

    They might have been stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one hand, they’re not free and competing against free software which is just as good if not better. On the other hand while they require payment, Businesses do not mind paying through the nose so long as its “THE BEST” and using alternative NON BEST software introduces unwanted friction.

    That 1 billion might’ve really been the offer they couldn’t have refused.