He deserves it though, they’re long and very well done videos

It’s about conforming to what I personally believe

He’s fucking 70? I thought he preferred them younger

We don’t even fully understand the brain itself, let alone how to recreate it.

This is token click bait scientific “journalism”

While I won’t deny there is a biological difference that impacts performance there’s also a systemic societal difference that doesn’t help.

In general women are not given the same support, whether from family, schools, coaches, research or funding, to become top athletes.

It’s certainly much better that it has been in the past now days and it’s getting better, but even just people saying “women aren’t as good as men” is something that sinks into the psyche of women who want to compete.

It’s akin to men from poorer nations who can’t afford resources, time and training, having a hard time competing against “richer” nations who invest more into it

To add extra weight to this comment. It is a common tactic to attempt to “bounce” a batter out, which basically means bowling with enough speed at such a short length that it comes towards the body, and especially, the head. If a batter is unprepared, it usually requires getting out of the way because trying to play a shot is likely to end up with you getting out or struck by the ball.

The ball is much harder and denser than a baseball and even a famous up and coming professional, international, batter died when he failed to get out of the way and was struck in the head.

Basically, there is a very real safety concern for players when it comes to something like this.

I guess the idea is that if a person is giving you zero ad revenue, then them switching to a diff browser instead of removing ad blocker doesn’t change your equation.

But if any of them do just turn off the ad blocker it’s a win…

However I’m not sure if they lose other revenue because they don’t use chrome (like data tracking info)

Wait, it’s she alive? The wording in the article makes it sound like she’s dead.

“which one do I shoot?” vibes.

I guess Facebook is bad for it’s… Well general shittiness… But they did invent react which a lot of the good parts of the internet use

The way the poster reads it looks like this is the 1 millionth march of 4 children. Which is kind of hilarious.

I’ve heard good things about proton. Considering switching to that as well. Other than heading so many places use your old email until you update it is there any reason you did it gradually?

You’ve got it backwards. If it wasn’t for the government, regulations and anti monopoly laws there wouldn’t be any new companies, it’d just be one major Corp for each sector.

They still don’t even go far enough tbh.

Mmm, pan seared grandma

Not to defend it, but in situations like this I think they have to be vague for legal reasons. There’s a fine line between reporting the news and defamation (regardless of how true it is).

It’s bullshit, and people will use defamation and lawyers to attack people accusing them. But I can see why you’d want to be extra careful how you worded the title.

You joke, but this number is probably still too high. In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if shareholders technically lost money due to the interruption of potential customers by all the commotion.

I thought, not so long ago, this was the same meme but with “pilsner” instead if “ipa” .

I guess things are a trend/popular for a reason.

Oh my bad. I misread your comment as saying they gained 6 million.

Yeah that makes sense.

I yin the 200k is just Aussie subscribers though? Or are you saying they also had 6 million new aussie ones?

The article isn’t 100% clear, but it says “get lost 200k”. They the next sentence “the first time they’ve lost aussie subscribers”