I meant on threads and x. I know that the PDF is available

If it’s nothing, then there’s no harm in linking to it. Why block it?

By taking this action, the Streisand effect has taken place and now people are actively looking for it.

Edit: clarified my comment

I’ve been saying this for almost a year. Not open AI specifically but any company with a board of directors.

They aren’t considering the shareholder value of their most expensive liability: the CEO.

He (because let’s face it. It’s going to be a he in most cases) is paid millions of dollars with a golden parachute. Literally money that could be given back to shareholders through dividends.

The fact that Boards of Directors aren’t doing this could be evidence that they aren’t looking out for shareholders’ interests

Fwiw they aren’t really asking about the motorcycle. I mean they are but they are washing your mouse movements and how fast you click through the images. It’s okay to get a few images wrong.

I understand that the company is protecting its liability or whatever.

The company can do that by training your boss not to ask questions related to your health.

If they raise the price, then they only get money once. If they sell your data, now they have an income stream.

It’s exactly that reasoning that Republicans want to get rid of them.

“If a company thought the job was important, they would be doing it!”

It’s one of the reasons why I hate license proliferation. These custom licenses aren’t tested against case law so if they think you’re in violation you have to defend yourself.

The only way to give these assholes a run for their money is for people to start forking the project and ignoring any terms that are in violation of the GitHub TOS.

The Winamp Collaborative License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. It is designed to ensure that you have the freedom to use, Modify, and study the software, but with certain restrictions on the distribution of modifications to maintain the integrity and collaboration of the project.

Oh god…

No Distribution of Modified Versions: You may not distribute modified versions of the software, whether in source or binary form. No Forking: You may not create, maintain, or distribute a forked version of the software. Official Distribution: Only the maintainers of the official repository are allowed to distribute the software and its modifications.

Copy left is not a protected term but yeah this is a shit license.

And how the fuck do you contribute code back without forking the project?!

EDIT: It looks like an issue has already been created and I absolutely love this thread where the license they are using is in violation of Github TOS.

They should have just kept the source closed! The speculation is that whomever purchased it wants to crowdsource contributions without adding any value themselves.

I could see tor browser continuing to be developed. There are enough users who are technical enough to take on a browser project.

Christ…this needed to be major news a year ago. We really need to get banks out of the payment business but fear that they are pulling an Intuit and will make the FedNow system more challenging to use down the road.

Trump is just the fucking symptom. He’s terrible but nothing compared to the foaming at the mouse acolytes he has.

We need to make it impossible for this to ever happen again. I just don’t see this happening without another civil war.

Of course not! We employees of Fortune 500 companies use Google Sheets to manage critical data.

It’s in the cloud, that’s how you know it’s good.

(I’m not even joking…our VP said this)

A lot of hate on this guy. Not saying it’s not deserved. But it has to start somewhere.

“My exegesis of those half dozen passages, it hasn’t changed. I think the Bible says what it says, and disapproves of gay sex, full stop,” Hays continued. “But there’s a very arbitrary selectivity about picking out those two verses in Leviticus as the foundation for an opinion on this subject.”

I used to be a fundamentalist right wing Christian Republican. I see myself in this sentence.

The love of Christ that Christians say they have was nowhere near their hatred of “the gays”. Jesus says nothing of Homosexuality so Christians hang their politics on two really obscure verses in the Old Testament.

He’s taking steps in the right direction. He still has a ways to go to make amends.

But the fact that he’s publicly “coming out” with his apology should be seen as a good thing because he’s likely going to get bomb and death threats from the fundamentalists.

I use thepresident@whitehouse.gov any time some shitty website requires me to register for their newsletter or create a free account.

If Ashley Madison doesn’t (didn’t? Are they still around?) require email validation, and enough people hate you (or at least want to troll you), then yeah…might be legit.

I don’t have a problem with the death penalty as a concept.

I have a problem with the fact that it disproportionately is given to people of color where evidence is dubious and circumstantial.

Treason and sedition should still be capital crimes.

The guy is a senator. He was voted in by his state.

If they don’t want to be represented by him, they should have voted him out in 2022.

Very Jeremy Jamms energy.

There is a mayor that came out against Trump early in the election, I think even before Biden dropped out.

I am not aware of any Republican who are running for an elected office who have come out against Trump.

I think in the beginning he was testing the waters to see what he could get away with. He got more brazen as he got to the end of his term.