you are talking to someone so far int he deep end. i doubt its really worth engaging, judging by how they are responding everywhere.
you are talking to someone so far int he deep end. i doubt its really worth engaging, judging by how they are responding everywhere.
in my experience, ive had to remind a lot of my IT colleagues to have empathy, and quite often.
also, what may be natural to you isnt necessairly easy for others.
its just so sad. i thought reddit had pretty extreme views, but lemmy seems to be just worse. i guess this is where the crazies went when they got banned from reddit.
and lemmy’s growth will suffer for it.
i accidentally deleted instead of edited my coment:
original:
i dont agree. thats not about technology. thats about the people at a tech-related loction not being able to eat. thats the lacroix of tech news if anything.
i think id be fine with even something like this or even this musk news if it wasnt in such high volume from something so indirect to actual technology posts. the frequency of these is so tiring.
i dont agree. thats not about technology. thats about the people at a tech-related loction not being able to eat. thats the lacroix of tech news if anything.
the point hes trying to make is that just because x relies on y, that doesnt make y relevant to the topic of x.
so labor, while needed for tech, doesnt belong in tech. just like if i started posting about food shortages here, i could argue that food is needed for tech, but it does not belong in tech.
the popular answer does not equal the right answer. this is called c/technology. before you spin that elon is in tech so how he picks his nose matters, it doesnt.
lol man all these downvoters. cant yall just make c/xitter or c/SuckItMusk and post your hateboners there?
lol so much for moving on huh? im not buying your bullshit go sell to someone else
lol right…
so… you were calling me ignorant because of info youve gathered from a friend? lol …
yeah, lets not waste anymore of our time here. have a good day.
can you provide a source for alphabet paying for youtubes operating costs? i work for a subsidiary of a different rather large it consulting company (80k+ members) and we very much do and have our own budgeting because we are a profit generating subsidiary
odd that alphabet would pay for youtube’s operating costs since youtube operates at a multi-billion dollar profit.
and i apologize for presuming youre not educated in the industry. it actually came off worse than i meant. just some of your comments just do not align with my experience in the industry.
You should educate yourself on the topic. theres really more to it than “how much storage can fit on an sd card.” operating at the size and scope of youtubes database and userbase really is a challenge and considering how smoothly youtube runs for the most part isnt “pennies” worth of operating cost
Plus, its already known from their earnings reports that youtubes profit mostly comes from ads
yousay free but none of the operations and technology that support the possibility to even receive and globally distribute that content along with the plethora of features are free, nor free to run.
under 20k
??? I just listed 5 to your claim of 1
Kia Soul - 19.9
Kia Rio - 16.75
Kia Forte - 19.79
Hyundai venue - 19.65
Nissan Versa - 16.925
Welcome to Lemmy, where all the deep-frieds live.
youhave statistics on americans leaving vs immigrants coming in? curious about it.
The reason why is more that you have to justify top performmers against their peers and against their role responsibilities. That takes work and many managers dont want to do it.
there is no one definition