Read that fee article as well and it seems like the author just stated, that certain institutions benefit from world hunger.

In the interview, Kent explains he was not advocating global hunger but was intending to be “provocative” by saying certain individuals and institutions benefit from global hunger.

“No, it is not satire,” Kent told Marc Morano, founder and editor of Climate Depot. “I don’t see anything funny about it. It is not about advocacy of hunger.”

It doesn’t look like he’s advocating for global hunger, but criticizing those who do benefit from it

And a description saying which variable in which object was accessed. Could be better, could be worse 🤷

6€ is overpriced in Berlin? I need to move 🚗

https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians#:~:text=432%2C093 civilians have died violent,4.5-4.7 million and counting.

Melone