Doesn’t suing for damages mean you have to prove damages? The fucker just got reelected president, what damages did he succumb to?

Rich assholes who want to influence government will.

In a perfect world, yes, justice rules supreme for everyone.

In our actual world, if congress overturned the election (which is exactly what it would be), you think the already frothing at the mouth far right wouldn’t go apeshit? Imagine if the far right overturned a democraticly elected Democrat. We would lose our shit.

I am all for using every law and policy available to stop fascists. Overturning a seemingly fair election outcome, where the president elect was voted in by electorate AND popular vote is NOT one of those ways.

As much as I would love to see that, it would 100%, without a doubt, cause blood in the streets. Jan 6th would look like a beach vacation compared to what they would do if congress blocked it.

That data in the wrong hands…

Already have been. It’ll just get worse now.

They still don’t have fully autonomous 100k cars!

A lot have reported that they didn’t know they were campaigning for the PAC.

My janky duct tape together house I bought in 2010, that was built in '58 was 98k. In 12 years I sold it at 280k, with it still technically being out of code. My house was the cheapest sold in the neighborhood, some selling for 320k. It’s insane.

Don’t forget the bonus for cutting costs!

Yes, they had many chances and failed. But these new laws are NOT anyone’s fault but republicans.

It’s been the fucking wild west here in Texas due to new laws being pushed out then shot down so quickly, no one can keep track. Even the ones passed are written so badly, they can’t be interpreted correctly. The following is from an article from ProPublica

Although US abortion bans – which more than a dozen states have enacted in the two years since the supreme court overturned Roe v Wade – technically permit the procedure in medical emergencies, doctors across the country have said that the laws are worded so vaguely that they don’t know when they can legally intervene.

This has been repeated ad nauseum by doctors on local outlets. It’s meant to be vague and confusing.

This happened prior to the version of the law you posted.

Do you think they memorize how many steps they took? Do you think they calculate calories burned in real time in their head?

If you are not a 3rd party advocate, are you one of the nonvoters? Potatoe potahtoe

Look, neither of the candidates are perfect across the board. One candidate is by far the better one for my family being mixed race, immigrant family members, mostly women, most work public service and some are on medicade and social security. One candidate is staunchly against all of that. The 3rd party candidates are ghosts on all of those topics.

One candidate is giving Israel carte blanch to do what they want and to “get the job done”. The candidate I’m voting for is not aligned with how I want that situation handled, but it is less bad than “do what you want”.

If I don’t vote or if I vote 3rd party, or I vote Trump, I can’t live with how my family and I will potentially be treated.

That leaves me one fucking choice that isn’t 100% what I want, but 80% is way better than the alternatives.

You know what virtually every 3rd party advocate like you doesn’t say? Anything about how the 3rd party candidate would be good for Americans’ day to day life.

What will your 3rd party candidate (lets ignore the fact that not a sigle post advocates an actual candidate)do for me that directly impacts me and my family’s life? Will they fund social security? Are they advocates for ranked choice voting? Are they pro choice? Are they pro universal Healthcare? How about corporate reform? Dark money in politics? Net nutrality? Fucking crickets on all these topics from yall.

If you would get off the ONLY topic you all spew, maybe, just maybe, you could change some minds. The 3rd party push is so disingenuous, it’s just as bad as Republicans who only vote for Trump due to him helping overturn Roe v Wade.

China, if you’re listening…

The issue here isn’t sex, its censorship. Texas already requires age verification for adult sites. They got that win. Fine. Now they want to go after TV and movies. Ok.

So then what’s next?

They will then start going after anything “they” deem unfit. It’s a slippery slope. Just look at them already banning books.

But why did she wait so long to come out

/s

They own Hot Topic, Box Lunch and Torrid, and at least 2 or 3 more smaller companies.