Okay so why have guns then for the average person when they don’t get used to defend themselves against the governing forces at hand? Shooting at random adults and children is okay but shooting cops is over the line?

Shoot governing forces or ban guns is my point. And everybody replaying just ignores the ban guns part.

In my opinion shooting back raises the likelihood of getting out alive as you are not just a sitting duck.

And I to think people generally don’t want to murder. But what people want more than not to kill is to not be killed.

So use your gun or lose your gun. Doesn’t make sense otherwise.

I really don’t get why people don’t start shooting police. As I understand it guns are allowed to “defend yourself against the government”. Police is the government and they clearly are out of control shooting people.

So either use your weapons against the government or make guns illegal if you don’t use them anyway.

So in the end there are less cops which in return means less people shot dead by cops or cops are less scared because people don’t have guns and so they also don’t get shot by cops.

What I am saying is: either use your guns or make them illegal if you don’t use them anyway.

Like in school when you hit the bully back and get suspended.

“Warum tun menschen einem schlimme Dinge an? Weil man es zulässt.”

Sometimes the only decision is dying kneeling or dying standing.

You don’t need to invest an afternoon because Kali exists.

The point ist that you can’t do it yourself, the point is to get something running quick without much hassle.

It always comes down to the beans.

I can see your point. Other have sad that it should follow the horsearmor pattern. Which would make it a guess like “I wonder if I can use this animal part like the other animal parts which fill the same role.”

That way you could formulate an educated guess and be happy when it turns out right.

Not progressive but spineless. Like every religion when it loses relevance.

How is it bad that you have to figure something out in a game?

Thought a glitch is when a graphical interface bugs with artifacts and such.

Is it purely medicine or is a big part of that living conditions?

I guess it is a bit more nuanced than I formulated in my original comment. If your cat is healthy and dies of some kidney disease it is completely OK to heal that cat, in my opinion.

I just don’t think a cat, as it stands now, is made to live to 30 years because of cell decay etc.

In my time I have seen people keep other beings in a miserable state just because they couldn’t let go. They pump them full with medicine, not because they have a better life this way, but because they can’t let go.

And those beings where completely helpless and suffering. That is just something I don’t wish for a innocent being.

That was where my initial response stemmed from.

Yes.

I don’t forgive you.

It is okay that things die. Death is okay and you should accept it instead of trying to cheat it.

As if a 30 year old cat could live like a cat is “supposed” to.

Are you also critical of independent media?

If you have a blog where you talk about that, I would like to read it.

Must be about the last season.

Now you see me and now you sequel.

Pedophiles drive engagement so why would they be against that?

My gender is not important.