The fact that it kills so many is a marketing tool. It’s viewed as the “strongest” high and the people who die just “didn’t know their limit” unlike the user.

Where are those houses? Nowhere anyone wants to live

Death penalty litigation is always more expensive than just jail.

Even if it’s nationalized we still want energy generation as low cost as possible so we can use the national budget for other things.

It’s simply solved by the fact that I, as a human driver, can recognize now when a robo-taxi is driving and change my expectations of the car’s behavior. Right now it’s clearly evident what an autonomous car looks like and a reasonable person will have the expectation that they follow the letter of the law.

I interact with these vehicles on a daily basis in San Francisco and it would be weird if they weren’t driving perfectly.

“Rather than teasing apart who, what, or when is to blame, this report shows that the post-9/11 wars are implicated in many kinds of deaths, making clear that the impacts of war’s ongoing violence are so vast and complex that they are unquantifiable.”

Did this writer or anyone in this thread actually read the paper?