I expected better of Mort Pudland
I expected better of Mort Pudland
Ah the ad hominem attack, the bread and butter of people who have a half-formed argument. The signal of a weak argument dressed in forceful garb.
The differences do tend to stop juuust at the part where monetary interests of their funders begin.
Aside from that, very different parties.
I think I’ll ignore this
This guy frets
The airspeed velocity of an unladen spankswallow depends on the skill of the spank and the proximity of the swallow, but on average? 42
Have you tried a spankswallow? Much better and less likely to flee
There’s no reason to slander shitgibbons like that
Their individual special opinions tip their score from ‘good’ to ‘bad’ for reasons that other people probably wouldn’t care about, is my point.
More like stupris, amirite
Does your user name mean that you’re a lover of misspelling ready?
When the point of a fun website is finally and forever lost. Welcome to the bots and ads show!
I’ve found the same thing, critic scores are harder to use as predictors because there is too much variance between their individual special opinions about the importance of character development vs the average user enjoying a movie for what it is. Obviously crap is crap, but a 56% critic and 82% user score is usually more appealing than vice versa
An interesting idea. Was there no oppression before the West’s influence was felt? Do you consider Russia to be part of the West?
No worries, someone will make a Netflix docuseries that will be hyper popular for a week
Why would he? He probably gets his sick reference game from Miller and the rest of the gang
That venn diagram looks like the mid point of an eclipse
Good question
Tesla drivers had 23.54 accidents per 1,000 drivers. Ram (22.76) and Subaru (20.90) were the only other brands with more than 20 accidents per 1,000 drivers for every brand.
That would be a synopsis of the joke, yes
You expect me to be better than that?
All you did up above was exactly what you accused me of doing. I pointed out a fallacy (what were the other arguments exactly? Koch/Nazi? Yeah I didn’t mention them because the fallacy was the strongest part of their comment) and you created a false situation (that I “ran away” from something or other) and called that an ad hominem. Objectively incorrect.
Maybe a primer on Aristotelian logic might help you out… Unless of course you’d rather continue to dribble urine down your pant leg and present it proudly as a comment worth reading.