To point out that believing that someone deserves to have no freedom because they believe differently than you makes you more like them then you think.
Do better.
To point out that believing that someone deserves to have no freedom because they believe differently than you makes you more like them then you think.
Do better.
We can do BOTH.
Ahhh. Okay. You have no examples of anything I said, so you try and make a trollish gesture.
Fair enough. Thanks for playing. We’re done here.
Yeah, but this is lemmy so… the outrage is very real. Even for most of the people complaining about it that don’t even have AT&T.
If you use instagram, you support this disgusting shit.
How many times are they going to try this before they realize that it’s not a thing?
He’s absolutely right. His enemies are right here in the US.
We’re called- Americans. And we hate traitors.
Point out the part where I did that.
NARRATOR: He never paid it.
Ahh… you’re one of those people. It’s clearly pointless to continue this.
Fentanyl is legal when used under supervision- ONLY.
Also… all fentanyl fatalities legally possessed their drugs? Is that what you’re saying? So…every junkie death happened under a psychiatrists supervision? Because most car fatalities happens to people who legally own their vehicle- save for those that happens as a result of vehicle theft, or illegal operation.
That shit should never have existed to begin with. At least not before it could be regulated/limited in function.
Cars, legally manufactured to facilitate travel from place to place when used correctly and within the laws created that govern their use.
Please, tell us all exactly how this is comparable to illegal drugs, I’d love to hear it.
ask him for references….
ROFL!
Cool. You are exactly what you hate. And to me, just as bad as they are. You don’t get to play by THEIR rules just because you believe they are wrong…. .
You play by THE rules because you know you ARE right.
Who else do we know that wants to imprison people simply because of their beliefs?
Now, before you accuse me of “bootlicking,” or “sympathizing,” know that I find Nazis to be among the most abhorrent people that have ever existed- but I also also recognize that simply having a belief- regardless of how shitty it is- should never be a punishable offense.
Lest we become what we hate in others.
You’re pursuing the wrong point- my guy….
Made up or not, my point remains that people constantly bitch about YouTube, and then cry and complain when someone suggests they leave the platform.
Whether we name or after some contested psychological label, or just call them ignorant children, whining and hating on a thing only to defend it when someone suggest you stop using it if you hate it so much is incredibly stupid.
Not going to argue this any further.
Contested…. “My dude”, doesn’t mean non existent. It just means someone disagrees with it.
As in-
Your dumb point is contested by me. Does that invalidate it? Do I automatically win now?
Rights are a fiction? I’ll bet the Nazis believe the same thing.