For sure. If Trump’s raving about you, you must be doing something right.

I upvoted this before I saw what community it was in. Now I wish I could upvote twice.

Disney is no stranger to hypocracy of that sort. Look at them making their billions off of the public domain (Snow White, Cinderella, Aladin, The Little Mermaid, need I go on?) while lobbying heavily for longer copyright terms to keep works they made from being similarly adapted.

Yup, that’s right. The scene in GTA San Andreas there has become a viral meme to express… well… “ah shit, here we go again.”

I’ll try to say this delicately enough to not get banned…

The modlog (which also contains the full text of my post) cites as the reason for the removal of my post “rule 1” which according to the sidebar is “Be civil and nice.”

I think they consider any criticism of the government of Iran to be “incivility” and/or “meanness”.

(Hopefully I’m not misinterpreting the mods here. Mods, please feel free to step in and correct any such misrepresentation.)

Removed by mod

Oh shit, is it just the eventual end product of teenage rebelliousness?

DALLE LLaMA

Go:

describing IntelliJ as “good”.

Shots fired back. 😈

Yeah, I’m about as rabid a Free Software advocate as you’ll likely be able to find, but it’s 100% time we moved on from Stallman.

Anyone want to place bets on how long it is before Elon uses this as an excuse to whisper in Trump’s ear that he needs to classify the Fediverse as a terrorist organization? It’d conveniently shut down competition with Xitter (and other billionaire-owned social media sites) if Mastodon (and Lemmy and PeerTube and Diaspora etc) was shut down for “RaDiCaLiZiNg fErTiLiTy ClInIc BoMbErS” or whatever BS.

as it gets better

Bold assumption.

“Is it for a clock” sounds like he’s asking “is it four o’clock”

Very probably if you can’t think how it would be beneficial for your use case, it won’t be beneficial to your use case.

“Website” (as opposed to “web app”) sounds like something static with no server-side logic (save serving up static content) which further makes Docker not seem very useful for your use case. In your shoes, if I haven’t inferred too much, I’d probably first think of some CloudFront/S3-based solution.

Typically, Docker is used in cloud infrastructure (AWS or the like) in situations where there’s a lot of server-side resource usage and you want to be able to scale up on very short notice. It can also be useful for on-prem sort of situations, or for if you want to run server-side software in a “contained” sort of way where you don’t have to install your software’s dependencies on the host machine. (Running a Java app on an EC2 node without installing a JRE on the instance, for instance.) Docker is also good (particularly relative to PaaS options) for minimizing vendor lockin (though, again, only really if you have server-side logic to contend with, and if you’re dealing with a static website, it’s hard to imagine vendor lockin being an issue.)

I suppose you could shoehorn it in. Stick your static website on an EC2 node with a Dockerized Nginx to serve it, or even bundle your static website into a Docker image, but I’d imagine you’d pay more for such a solution than just using CloudFront with S3 or whatever.

(And yes, I keep mentioning AWS, but there are lots of hosts out there. For the more focused LAMP-stack-providers rather than IaaS options, Docker would be of even less use.)

Now, even if you do intend to have server-side logic, I’m not sure Docker really adds much to the conversation unless your server side logic is expected to use a fair bit of CPU and/or RAM, you’re expecting to get a good amount of request volume, and you want to be able to scale horizontally very quickly.

True, but it’s gone in spikes largely driven by new strains since the original.

Obligatory

It’s a little bit like Satan telling someone he’s a big fan of their work.

If you want to watch it

Pass, thanks.