Not sure what your point is. I never said anything to the contrary.

No, people reading scholastic documents and drawing the wrong conclusions is how we got into this mess.

Yes that was my point.

The fact checkers were not incompetent, they weren’t involved at all.

I’m glad that works out for you.

Most people aren’t road tripping in their electric vehicle every day.

They can’t road trip ever if the vehicle doesn’t have sufficient range. I don’t understand how you can even be in this conversation when you don’t understand basic principles like this.

If you don’t understand how temperature affects battery chemistry, capacity, and charging

I understand how it affects all of these. It doesn’t cause any of it to “not charge properly”. EVs are used in the coldest places in the world with no major problems.

The average commute is 52 miles. Most EVs sold in the US have a range of 250 miles or more.

No one cares about “average commute” when buying an electric car and considering the offered range. They’re thinking about long trips.

So a resistive heater eating 10% of your range is way less of an issue than your battery not charging properly in cold weather.

Who said anything about batteries “not charging properly”? What does that even mean?

heat pumps should be available, but they aren’t going to save you if cold weather kills your battery.

We’re not talking about killing batteries, we’re talking about electric range. Heat pumps extend your electric range and 20 miles can absolutely be the difference between making it to the next charger or not.

the logical thing to do is whatever gets the most people on the site the fastest, not do something that instantly alienates a massive amount of people

Not true. Facebook knows no one is leaving (at least not in any significant numbers). So what makes them money is showing ads. What allows them to show more ads is people staying on the site longer. What keeps people on the site longer is “engagement”. The easiest way to keep people “engaged” is to sow discord.

Just think about it, are you more inclined to comment on an image of a cute puppy, or a post where someone is spreading disinformation?

Honestly its probably for the best. When people started investigating the “Fact checkers”, it was discovered that they didn’t know anything about the checks that were attributed to them.

Why would they be on Zuck’s payroll if they weren’t going to help him?

It defintely is a huge issue, considering resistive heaters use 3x as much energy. Most EVs have a “low range” and anything you can do increase it without adding more batteries and weight and cost, especially in winter, is a huge advantage.

It uses the same amount of energy to create cold as it does to create heat.

Pretty sure they meant EVs

You forgot Ultra

You left out the part about Honey charging sellers to hide coupons.

It’s more expensive in remote areas and areas without competition.

Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

“Someone” is paying to host every website. The point is it’s free to you.

Exactly my point.

I don’t understand what any of that has to do with what you or I said.

or is the logic that they’re giving a discount because they can make the extra money with the data.

Yes that is what I said.

but now it’s the norm and they can charge more for it and still make more money selling data.

They still have to compete with all the other TV manufacturers.