I read that as not being directed at you but more as realisation that the state of things are even worse than suggested in the first comment.

“Why is this specific gender affirming care ok but not the rest?”

“That specific thing is actually mutilation”

“So to THEM (not you) mutilation is ok but not gender affirming care(any at all)!”

Bot or not, it’s no tits!

Your article contains a statement from Stanley: “no lead is present on the surface of any Stanley product that comes into contact with the consumer nor the contents of the product.” I don’t find anything supporting your claim that the cups were “found to contaminate drinks with lead.” Am I missing something?