If I plug my ears and go ‘lalalalalalala I can’t hear you’ then nothing bad is happening.
UK Labour party
If I plug my ears and go ‘lalalalalalala I can’t hear you’ then nothing bad is happening.
UK Labour party
Most likely more fossil fuels because they’re faster and cheaper to roll out.
If voting changed anything they wouldn’t let us do it.
I saw hamas enter a school once. So I called the military to call in an airstrike on the school. 62 kids died but we got the hamas so it was all good.
Whelp it’s a shame that xiaomi is now going to end up on the entity list.
Doctors
Does she also have the force feedback pedal?
What are you going to do to ensure israel complies mr biden. I’m guessing what you usually do, fuck all.
Repairability is definitely a factor, but don’t forget considering how long a company will support software updates for the device, how the device meets your needs no only today but 5-6-7 years from now, and your options for repurposing the device once it reaches EoL.
Buy a phone and keep it for as long as you can, and in general, just buy less phones. Don’t upgrade each year, that’s extremely stupid.
They’re also all made by heartless megacorps anyway. None of the companies are really ‘good’ just different forms of terrible.
No one cares. Just use whatever phone you like. This post is extremely cringey.
deleted by creator
Surely ‘the most moral army™️’ would have no problem demonstrating their innocence right. Let’s have a little look at some of the moral things they’ve been doing as of yet.
Hmmmmm… killing unarmed protesters. Raping prisoners?!?!?!
Democrats will do anything to lose an election
It would probably be wiser to implant a bullet in your brain then let that man do neurosurgery on you.
Ah yes. That’s why Israel killed hamas’ lead negotiator. To move forward the negotiations. Biden is senile.
It’s important enough to have in the first paragraph of the article. Why not have it in the headline? The reality is that many people do not even read the article. The headline not only has a role in capturing the attention of readers but is often the extent of information people receive? Saying ‘Israeli strike’ is only two more words. Why did reuters not include it. It’s naive to think there isn’t a propaganda spin to not mentioning it in the headline.
Who killed them reuters? Did they just simultaneously spontaneously cease living? Why didn’t you put who killed them in the headline?
Here’s how I see it. Gen AI and LLMs are really good for things that I won’t pay money for. It’s undoubtedly impressive tech, but it really deserves to remain as a cool research project rather than an actual functional product.