

Actually no, as there are some public information sources that could be tapped to find a corresponding number of arrests.
Actually no, as there are some public information sources that could be tapped to find a corresponding number of arrests.
You forgot the best part. Some people opened their homes to immigrants, so there is no records of them being there and ICE would have to be searching every single house in Rich white communities to find them.
And boy will they be kicking a hornets nest if they do so.
My husband says it is not secret what they use. It is something called L4-SEC which has formal proofs of correctness
I believe the holocaust museum calls these sorts of lists the point of fight now or die one by one
The cost of them not having the source code or the right to repair the shit they bought and paid for with our tax dollars.
Iran already has the information needed to make nuclear weapons; the Trump administration’s DOGE leaked that information
Well, think of it as positive engagement to stop buying gasoline vehicles.
Guess they never heard of live-bootstrap
Who needs more than 8GB disk space for a Debian computer with Firefox and Chrome?
Easy make the office procedure private with the child, ask the child what answer that they want told to their parents.
It is not going to teach Christianity but to end it.
bah, https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap
you don’t even need a terminal or a prompt to bootstrap every tool you need.
not exactly, as there are rust compilers like mrust that don’t actually have borrow checkers and virtually none of those safety checks actually occur and there is a question of if the gcc rust compiler would be implementing that feature into the compiler.
So, that would be an attribution failure; as it isn’t required by the language but the most popular rust compiler does include that feature.
But yes, more compilers would likely benefit the languages they support by also adopting that feature by default.
Well rust has a borrow checker which does make some memory bugs harder to create but to say that rust solved any of the known open problems in computer security. The answer is clearly no. It just copied some good ideas from ocaml into C++ and got some good marketing.
borrow checkers also already exist for C/C++/etc [just most people don’t use them]
so, slightly safer defaults than C/C++ but doesn’t contain any new/unique security magic.
50MB for a sub POSIX kernel and a shell prompt for a 50MB ISO image that has less functionality than a 4KB kernel (L4SEC) which has actual formal proofs of correctness.
Well, I guess it has Rust as a selling point but that isn’t something that should matter if the goal is real security.
The assembly would be:
Mov rax,1 Mov rdx, 0 Mov rsi, buffer Mov rdi, buffer.length Syscall Mov rax,57 Syscall