That’s the only good thing in this story. It usually gets ugly when guns are also involved.
Do you see where I’m going here, or do I have to involve it in my story for you to see?
That’s the only good thing in this story. It usually gets ugly when guns are also involved.
Do you see where I’m going here, or do I have to involve it in my story for you to see?
Totally get your point, and this is the logical way to think about it, but I’m not sure what decision I would make when I don’t have the time to think through.
Also, I don’t think we can be sure that this store policy is not about guns, at least in part. I’m not from the States, but when there’s the implication of more people seriously hurt in public, in the USA, that’s where my mind is.
I feel like OP did the right thing by heart, and this story would have had a different ending in a country with different gun laws and history of gun violence. Also if the case really is OP was let go to show others that they should not engage in this “reckless behaviour” I feel it at least it should have been communicated as such when fired.
This is the first time I’m exploring this, but I think you’re wrong.
On Mastodon you can:
So post visibility is not something you set per profile, but per post. But you have an effective tool to decide who you let in AND remove on the way.