Nice, thanks!
My Keyoxide Idendity:
aspe:keyoxide.org:TJXAWXPMSAG6VPARJQRWNB2TPA
Nice, thanks!
Thorsten high is silly haha. Emotional is also not meant for TTS more for research I think.
I think thorsten made the only good model in German, I really want to make my own one! Or get some famous people on board?
Hahaha yes it is.
Whats that? Mind to share an audio file?
They have 3 types of clients, only one works as an Android TTS engine, the others are useless.
Yes they have 3 types of client apps
Yes of course :) I use sherpa-onnx-1.10.26-arm64-v8a-de-tts-engine-vits-piper-de_DE-thorsten-medium
and there is nothing irrelevant in that name.
Still after another commenter wrote how overwhelmed they are with that INSANE download page, I felt that when you dropped those 2 names
That would then require running code from memory, which needs to be enabled in recent GrapheneOS. But all fine, they should absolutely do that as they obviously do that currently but during compilation.
Client app + wizard to select language and model type + downloaded model
These names are a joke hahaha
Just scroll down until the page is fully loaded and use the search function.
It is FOSS, and the build instructions are here
https://k2-fsa.github.io/sherpa/onnx/android/build-sherpa-onnx.html
Those guys are incredibly active, look at this!
https://k2-fsa.github.io/sherpa/onnx/index.html
(And no, not on F-Droid, if you look at the crazy amount of packages that makes sense)
I thought the same.
I suppose they use stuff like real-time-kernels.
Depending on your needs, a typical wifi router would need
The software needs to run on there, being Linux based that should be absolutely no problem. But a RPi5 afaik still has no upstream Linux support, but it also way overpowered for that job.
I totally think about building my own router, but also enjoy the service of Turris, their advanced OS that requires these high specs, their package repo and custom OS features not present in upstream OpenWRT.
If you want to configure all that XD I dont want to.
You say OpenWRT is not designed for embedded computers? I cant imagine why not.
Interesting find! Cant help you thougj
Having a router as a NAS is pretty standard.
But you are right, it may be less secure.
They contribute upstream, another user here is running upstream OpenWRT.
I assume they just have a heavier WebUI and a more “bloated” configuration, which wouldnt suit OpenWRT
Other
Yeah its better
Strange
your language abbreviation like “de” or “en”