Similarly in 2000, Gore campaign reported a leak from the Bush campaign to the FBI.
Similarly in 2000, Gore campaign reported a leak from the Bush campaign to the FBI.
I believe the former is the reason for the policy affecting the latter.
There are a few people with a similar name to me that don’t seem to understand how email works. I get signed up for all sorts of their things. I get notices of their pizza deliveries, when they apply for car loans, flight info, hotel stays, I even end up in family message email chains.
Every once in a while I go though and delete these accounts, that’s how it’s happened multiple times. Sometimes I just take the account over though, if it’s got reward points or something.
Thus means nothing, I have been signed up multiple times to that site by people who don’t understand that my emails address is not theirs. And apparently Ashley Madison doesn’t validate email addresses.
So I guess every reaction and review on the internet that is ad supported or behind a payroll is theft too?
I am confused, don’t they scan your card before you check out?
I have few doubts that there were many plans aimed at agitation depending on the events of Jan. 6.
Can this be done with emoji?
It is always an open convention. By rules, delegates are pledged but not bound.
If it weren’t Trump running I think he would have stepped aside. He believed in 2019, and probably still believes now, that he has the best chance against Trump and that Trump is a singularly existential threat.
Windows has beta channels for their updates
According to the Supreme Court, the President of the United States could do this and not be indicated.
This is a great example terrible AI writing.
Picking the worst possible candidates apparently doesn’t matter.
/me gesticulating wildly at Donald Trump
Doesn’t everyone who goes on a radio show give a set of questions? I mean, politicians are supposed to be able to answer more questions than celebrities, but it’s still SOP.
The tears of Conservatives
I feel the ambiguity leans towards being misunderstood, so I think it best to clarify.
That article says that the US claims the peir area was not used as a landing zone.
I would hesitate to call it terrorism, it was targeted at military persons with an intent at military disruption and any public casualties were collateral damage. It may have been a war crime though.