Trump and Co don’t even think about feeding soldiers, let alone poor children.

For the same reason the whole title is in quotes: American literacy is very poor.

Agreed. Stop subsidizing it. This will obviously hurt the farmers in the area but hey, free market. Insurance isn’t a charity.

It probably would. Just wear your most tacti-cool gear and join a group. You’d need several people on board to make a difference though.

Those assholes don’t show name or insignia. Show them the problem with that.

The club itself probably is. The restaurant specifically, maybe, maybe not. I’ve been to a bunch of yacht clubs over the years and the restaurant doesn’t always break even. Part of the appeal is having the exclusive spot. If members need to subsidize it, they’re often OK with that.

If mine could do that “find me the approval email for x last week” I’d use it, but if outlook had a decent search I wouldn’t need it.

Broken clocks and all that

As much as I want to believe this, so far the only source I’ve seen is Dean Blundell who is not what you would call a real journalist.

We’re using it for closing security flaws identified by another tool. It’s boring, unchallenging work that is nonetheless still important. It’s also repetitive and uncreative enough that I’m comfortable having a machine do it.

There’s still human review but when it’s stuff like “your error messages should escape variables” or “write a longer function name” having a tool that can do most of the grunt work is valuable.

So far the excuse he’s been using to end run Congress is that it’s a national emergency. I suppose Hollywood profits are also an emergency?

What am I ever doing expecting consistency from this guy? That’s just asking for frustration.

I wouldn’t call it a hazard, but don’t plan on doing anything important for the rest of the day.

Everything you said, and the longest un defended border in the world. Imagine if the Taliban could drive to major US cities.

100%, we’re doing human and automated reviews on the code changes, and the code explanation is just the first step of several.

you have to be there when the code was written and went through the various iterations.

Well, we don’t have that. We’re mostly dealing with other people’s mistakes and tech debt. We have messy things like nested stored procedures.

If all we get is some high level documentation of how components interact I’m happy. From there we can start splitting off the useful chunks for human review.

I’m in software and we’re experimenting with using it for certain kinds of development work, especially simpler things like fixing identified vulnerabilities.

We also have a pilot started to see if one can explain and document an old code base no one knows anymore.

It would be like a construction company replacing a team of carpenters with some people who took a weekend woodworking course.

It takes a special kind of clueless to think they would be remotely equivalent.

I don’t think there’s such a thing as an unbiased AI. They’re all biased based on the input data.

Something like this would be inherently subjective, it’s not a pure data question with a clear yes or no.