IIRC, some of the games are still playable without Steam, it’s just the ones with Steamworks integration can’t be played without Steam.
Though if you want full game ownership, obviously go with something like GOG.
IIRC, some of the games are still playable without Steam, it’s just the ones with Steamworks integration can’t be played without Steam.
Though if you want full game ownership, obviously go with something like GOG.
But I will not knowingly support this asshole if whatever his company produces isn’t going to benefit anyone other than him and his cronies.
I mean it was already not open-source, right?
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
I’m confused, how can a company that’s gained numerous advantages from being non-profit just switch to a for-profit model
Money
Also I just want to point out that the rifle should be considered no longer safe to use unless thoroughly inspected by an expert. In a similar case some years back, the police officer’s sidearm was pulled into the machine. After retrieval it was found that the weapon had been magnetized by the scanner and as a result the firing pin was able to spontaneously release.
Something tells me he won’t know that.
Wow that’s like a circus lmao
They were asking why is getting the dosing right important if the person is going to die anyway.
I don’t think it will help with that, the war on pornography is only going to get worse.
That’s what I’m wondering.
I haven’t heard any reports of or seen any abuse for emulators like Xenia, RPCS3, Dolphin, Citra, etc. I wonder if this is something unique/specific to people finding out it’s Stenzek, or if it’s more widespread than we realize?
Personally, I do think non-permissive licenses aren’t nice, and I do think there should be criticisms, skepticism, and concerns to be voiced about that. At the same time, if it’s the owners project, he is free to do with it as he wishes. Then again, if something has a large enough of a community, you could argue that it’s no longer just their project. But I understand that if you want to prevent people profiting off of your work (and your contributors work), a no-commercial license does make sense. It’s a complex situation.
I think Harris has a good chance. People are fed up with the orange pumpkin man, as they should be.
As it should be. Rockstar Games deserves nothing less.
I won’t be buying other Rockstar games if they do this with other Rockstar games, since it means I won’t be able to play them since I use Linux and they don’t want to use the checkmark to enable BattlEye on Linux/Proton.
What an incredible sentence.
Just because they are the cheapest option doesn’t mean they aren’t a monopoly. They clearly have the most inventory. One store having all of the inventory of everything and being the leader for selling products of any kind, is a pretty big problem.
If they can put others out of business (pretty sure they have put smaller stores out of business in the past), they can become an even bigger monopoly.
It’s not just the tech industry, it’s most industries. They have tons of inventory of everything.
Well yeah just add another war crime to the list.
In Canada they absolutely are lol
I don’t think this is going to be just cutting fat though. They’re going to have their desperate and least-talented employees working in the office while their most talented employees will end up finding remote employment elsewhere. That’s how RTO always goes.
It also depends on where you live. Where I live, if you are working a fully remote job, and your employment contract doesn’t specify that you need to work in the office, if they try to force you back into the office then you can quit and go on employment insurance since it would be considered a constructive dismissal.
That’s both disturbing and completely expected. I’ve generally always preferred monitors over TVs tbh, this is just another reason for it lol