Turkey had previously spent months blocking Sweden’s application, accusing it of hosting Kurdish militants.
Man, fuck Turkey
Turkey had previously spent months blocking Sweden’s application, accusing it of hosting Kurdish militants.
Man, fuck Turkey
This is misinformation. Flatpaks are far less secure than installing from apt. All packages installed from apt are cryptographically signed. This isn’t the case with flatpaks.
Ah, if it’s only available on flatpaks, that’s why few people know about it.
Flatpak is a very insecure method to download software BTW, you probably should avoid it
Edit: It’s curious that I’m getting downvoted for stating a fact. It seems a lot of flatpak users don’t understand security. But that’s kinda the point: even the flatpak developers don’t understand the difference between integrity and authenticity
Flatpak currently does not provide authenticity, and one developer made it clear that he doesn’t understand why that matters in the above ticket that requested signatures of packages back in 2016. It’s been 7 years and still they haven’t fixed this. I don’t think the flatpak team understands or cares about security.
How is this better than zim? Is this in the Debian repos?
I like XMPP and OTR is nice, but we need double-ratchet for secure communications and sync with multiple devices.
Pick 4 NGOs per year. Donate 10% of income at the end of the year to them evenly.
Next year pick another 4 NGOs that you think did great work that year.