Ok. So they force his door open. Great.
Oh wait, it didn’t end there?
Ok. So they force his door open. Great.
Oh wait, it didn’t end there?
All we have to do is make him president elect! We don’t even have to inaugurate him!
Is it shocking? I feel like a lot of kids are angry/hareful
To save the dogs, right? /s
Sorry, did you say something rude? That’s a paddlin slam down on the pavement
I have spent a couple years badmouthing this dude, but the police bodycam footage is pretty crazy. It’s also crazy to me that a bunch of Miami cops would pull over one of the city’s most well-known athletes and nobody was like “gee, maybe we shouldn’t go so hard on this one, he’s famous”
That article is pretty different. It barely touches on the kneejerk reaction from the right, which is the point of OP’s article. It doesn’t get in depth with voters at all, tbh.
If you wanted an article discussing the facts of drug smuggling, yes, your article is short, sweet, and to the point. However, all of that content AND MORE is included in the original, since the point of the original is how people have shifted right on drug policy, despite there being no evidence for Trump’s statements.
I’m a little confused as to how the title makes Trump sound good. Facts are facts.
Instead of downvoting because you think the title makes the article pro-Trump, people should actually read the article
There’s a really good Dick pun to be made as a follow-up joke here, I just can’t think of it
You know it’s bad when the person who makes everything into a joke admits that it’s fucked
I read a lot of fucked up news stories, but this one is one of the wildest in recent memory
What most people don’t realize is that childhood vaccinations don’t actually last forever. It’s been probably 30 years since I completed most of my vaccinations as a toddler, but when I got my most recent job (at a healthcare provider), they tested me and I needed boosters for some childhood vaccines due to losing immunity.
They’re in our blood and even in our brain?
There are a number of feminist communities on Lemmy that you’re welcome to join, although I doubt you’ll get very far with arguments that were addressed in the 1990s
Ha. This guy hasn’t heard of nukes
There’s an alternate timeline where he wins and can’t get anything through because there aren’t enough progressive Dems in the senate.
The other thread was an attempt to gauge feedback on specific ideas (as this post mentions, they are so in the works) and it precipitated this post
Honestly, the bias piece was never the important piece for us. It was the credibility piece.
Just trying to give some insight into why we used it in this community.
The last sticky thread actually had some really good feedback, like using a fact checker that is part of the International Fact Checking Network (of which MBFC is not a member) and many other similarly great suggestions.
One of the issues might be in the name. We don’t want to create a bias bot. That seems like a fool’s errand, which is one thing we learned in the process of implementing the MBFC bot. We want to create something that makes people aware of posts that are from medium to low quality sources. Obviously, if the source is super sketchy, we’d delete it, but there’s a lot of grey area where we leave things up.
Exactly. I’m not saying the cops should do it, but you’d think they’d take a moment to pause before harassing literally one of the most famous men in their city. If that doesn’t make them reconsider their actions, just imagine what it’s like for everyone else. Tyreek Hill even made a comment about it in a post-game press conference, where he wondered what would’ve happened to someone else.