IIRC, it uses a database of common and popular songs stored locally on your phone (possibly adapted to what Google knows about your taste in music, idk) and only goes online for matches when you do a manual song search.
IIRC, it uses a database of common and popular songs stored locally on your phone (possibly adapted to what Google knows about your taste in music, idk) and only goes online for matches when you do a manual song search.
deleted by creator
Mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell.
In theory, yes. I’ve never actually plugged it into a computer. It’s a Sony PS-LX300USB. Looks like you can pick one up used for less than $100. Might be worth it if you’re currently buying everything twice.
My record player has a USB port…
Replace “all 1’s or something” with “drop database or something” and it 100% applies.
I’m in the US so I’ve always needed a passport to watch porn (or anything else) in Britain.
It has to start somewhere. Today it’s virtue signaling, tomorrow it’s normal and expected.
Doing the right thing for the wrong reasons can still be a win.
deleted by creator
Well, they never said it was soup proof glass.
I knew exactly which video that would be. Such a perfectly clear explanation.
You’ve got an unmatched single quote.
It occurred to me that I might be wrong about the locally stored database, so I conducted an experiment.
I put my phone in airplane mode, then went to my record player and played a song with my phone sitting nearby. Within a minute, my phone correctly displayed the currently playing song, despite having no connectivity whatsoever. This proves that there is a local database of songs against which the service can compare what it hears. Obviously the database does not include every song ever written, that would be ridiculous.
I never claimed that the phone was not listening, it has to listen in some way to recognize music. What I did claim, and have now proven, is that it can identify songs without sending the audio to Google.