If there is anyone who knows anything it is the insurance companies. Thats their literal job to calculate the risks of something costly with heigh accuracy so they can put a price on it thus distributing a large single cost across many people as a small regular cost. If an insurance company doeant want to do somthing hiatory would tell us there is a damn good reason why.

Wait u guys think thw french follow speed limmits? They go double the speed while texting and smoking then when the cops pull em over they surrender.

And i thought my ping was bad.

Its not big tech unless they are abusing a monopoly.

I wrote a script to generate seed phrases and look up if that derived into a key with any value. Then did the maths on how impossible that is and decided to stop.

I dont support that either i find it extraordinarily offensive you are trying to apply a racist steriotype to me.

Removed by mod

How was this banned for rule 1 and the comment i was replying to not. I called the guy a lier cos he said he didnt want an argumwnt while callibg me a small minded bad person. Can someone please explain how this not unequal application of rules.

As it stands im the only one who has provided any peer reviewed papers to back my point. Said study alsi happens to be a meta review so it reviews all the other papers and assesses them.

https://segm.org/sites/default/files/20210323_Evidence%2Breview_GnRH%2Banalogues_For%2Bupload_Final_download.pdf

Im so glad you brought up that example because a review of the literature commissioned by the nhs found that the results where of low certainty and had no reduction in mental health gender dysphoria or psychosocial impact.

Im going to assume a review of all the peer reviewed literature should know better than docters with a financial incentive to continue providing said services.

I can read a peer reviewed journal and fron that provide an informed opinion.

I dont really care what the practising doctors say i care what the published peer reviewed docters say i they say its ineffective at achieving its goals of reduced harm.

Removed by mod

Ask ur leaders not to house terrorists might be a good start.

Now thats a bad faith argument. I usually get banned for calling people an idiot or is that only cos my opinions are controversial?

“I dont agree with you your argument must be bad faith” is one hell of a bad faith argument.

So you consider the side effects an acceptable risk?

They cant their parents can tho. Puberty blockers are not a life saving treatment they are physical only and thus just like plastic surgery shouldnt be given to kids. And no u cant argue they will kill themselves if they dont get treated there is plenty of peer reviewed papers proving that to be false.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod