if legislation was to be passed against this book, would it be called the “bye bible bill”?

my two cents are, for what it’s worth,

that no-one really believes in a flat earth.

they just revel in creating dissension

and crave all the ensuing attention,

so let’s let it remain in that realm of mirth.

all that’s fine and good, but one just needs to see your username to fathom what could potentially go wrong.

youtube bermudas.

or build in a return-to-factory-by-yourself feature into them.

someone misunderstood the way in which a pen is mightier than the sword.

i mean, isn’t it a submarine, after all?

“catfishers hate this one clever trick!”

wait, in the article, why is his left eye removed in the first photo and his right eye in the next?

since when are nazis so against electricity? or is it that she personally prefers gas?

how would you feel about an article titled,

“This” word in article titles infuriates internet readers

it’s a tennis match that Sean Connery plays without a partner.

all of this could have been avoided if only that one pesky 2000 year-old book was banned to begin with.

especially since just reading the headline made me cry.

I don’t think anyone appreciates being told to calm down when they’re pissed about something.

precisely.

What’s the stereotype exactly?

that only wives go nuclear when being told to calm down. you’ll never see a version of the meme in the OP where a woman is talking about her husband, for instance.

who is jesus talking about here and did the fonz tell him, “aaaayyyy, gender stereotyping isn’t cool!”?

the optimal approach would be to embrace public transport and let cars go the way of carthorses.

so, old Wine in a new bottle?

looks like you reneged on your own username, mate.

the KGB is the same juice as the CIA in a different jug. one may be marginally better than the other, but that’s like saying Mussolini was better than…

goddammit, i didn’t mean to invoke Godwin’s Law this early in the thread.