I would imagine the first one to be true. There’s no reason to inform everyone about it. I also predict Biden would be against it.

Yeah, frankly I think it wouldn’t even be good to tell Biden about it, he would likely discourage from that move. At best he would pretend he did not know about it.

They are also pushing the identity politics, so we are distracted fighting among ourselves instead of uniting against them

IMO tech bros’ main goal for this technology is to use it to manipulate public opinion on social media. It is perfect for it and the “daydreaming” (bullshitting) is perfect.

Notice that all social media are involved in it, Twitter was “sold” to xAI, the recent incident with Grok about South African apartheid. The 10 year ban to regulate it by states etc.

They talk about it increasing productivity (and are hoping that it could be used for that too), but if people would know it is meant for disinformation, they would be even more against skipping copyright for it.

I think the primary goal of LLM is to use it on social media to influence public opinion.

Notice that all companies that have social media are heavily invested in it. Also the recent fiasco with Grok taking about South African apartheid without being asked shows that such functionality is being added.

I think talking about it to replace white collar jobs is a distraction. Maybe it can some, but the “daydreaming” (such a nice word for bullshit) I think makes the technology not very useful in that direction.

Isn’t that what they are doing?

This actually shows that they’re is work being done to use LLM on social media to pretend to be ordinary users and trying to sway opinion of the population.

This is currently the biggest danger of LLM, and the bill to prevent states from regulating it is to ensure they can continue using it

The reason why communism is not great is because to implement it (at least now) it leads to authoritarianism.

IMO social democracy (which is regulated capitalism) which we see in Scandinavian countries looks the best right now.

That was the plan. The spectacle in the WH about suits was to convince Americans that Ukraine shouldn’t be helped. Trump was convinced that blocking help to Ukraine will force them to surrender, and the war will be over.

When Ukraine and Poland contacted WH asking what was going on, WH just acted like they don’t know what’s happening.

TBH if it was a matter of national security, I would really prefer if he didn’t have any say either.

He eventually wants the military inside of the country. Looks like he already started that, first around the border, and eventually plans to expand it.

We should absolutely put pressure since this is illegal.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/how-turning-border-military-zone-evades-congress-and-threatens-rights

Turns out they have been using AI for decades.

They say that because they are selling it.

And yeah, my experience is the same. The most frustrating is when writing in a typed python, and it gives answers that are clearly incorrect, making up attributes that don’t even exist etc.

My bad then.

From yesterday’s reports it looked like they won majority, so technically they don’t need to form a coalition?

Edit: looks like they don’t have majority and still need a coalition.

Ok, then it looks like we are on the same page on that.

Though, seeing tankies support Russia and China tells me they don’t care about social aspects of communism, so the only thing left is authoritarianism.

The term might be even more appropriate now as it originates, because they basically supported using tanks against the population to squash Hungarian Uprising. A totally authoritarian move.

At that point there’s not much difference between them and today’s far right. I mean tankies will openly say they support communism, but their actions shows that’s not what they are truly after.

To me it looks like tankies were product of Soviet propaganda while MAGA is a product of Russian propaganda, and that’s why they both share so many common views.

That’s because of corruption. As of now communism to be implemented requires authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is the main reason why communism is bad.

Currently both, tankies as well as far right don’t really care about socialism (if tankies cared about socialism they wouldn’t support China or Russia). All they are supporting is authoritarianism.

What far right labels as far left (in US at least) are people who support liberal democracy with protections and safety nets for working class. The “most radical” Bernie Sanders is exactly for that.

There might be actual communist parties in Europe, they hardly have any support.

Yes pro authoritarian far left that’s basically communism.

China is hardly a communism right now, Russia definitively isn’t a communism. So the current tankies that are worshipping Russia and China aren’t really for communism, they are only pro authoritarianism.

They are actually more aligned with MAGA than anything, the only difference is just that they don’t have problem openly supporting Russia and China.

Since this is world community there are people in other countries, and might be different definition what’s far left. But in US what authoritarians are labeling as far left are people who still want liberal democracy, but with social programs (what you have in EU, especially in Scandinavian countries). The “furthest left” politicians, Bernie Sanders is basically advocating for medical care for all Americans and taxes on rich. Basically so the government works for the people but against them.

Today’s tankies (appropriately to the name) are pro authoritarianism and it just “happens” that’s what far right Russia is. Even China isn’t truly a communism, but they are both authoritarian.

Federal charges… only because he allegedly killed someone from the higher class.