- 2 Posts
- 23 Comments
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•Wikimedia Foundation's plans to introduce AI-generated article summaries to WikipediaEnglish124·20 days agoWikipedia is not made to teach people how to read, it is meant to share knowledge. For me, they could even make Wikipedia version with hieroglyphics if that would make understanding content easier
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft Gives European Union Users More Control: Uninstall Edge, Store, and Say Goodbye to Bing PromptsEnglish43·21 days agoI love being in EU
So the current situation in Windows ecosystem is that application developers spend time working on protecting users against their own operating system
So I agree, I thought you are talking about some profit enshittification on Stack Overflow
For me, strict rules are what make this website useful. No threads named “help me” is why I like reading it.
For newcomers there is https://stackoverflow.com/staging-ground
Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?
have you seen: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange
That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.
Can you give an example of this enshittification for profit?
People seem to be happy because of SO becoming irrelevant. I really don’t get it, I used this website for many years now and for me it is the second (after Wikipedia) most valuable source of knowledge. The UI is clean, no intrusive adds, best answer is the most visible. Threads are well organised and on topic. No spam, no dark patterns, no wasting your time. Discoverability is great, you can easily browse and learn knew things. It is also SEO friendly. Why do you prefer Discord? What do I miss?
What exactly do you accuse Stack Overflow for? As far as I know this service has always been free to use and data is easily downloadable.
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@beehaw.org•Fortnite now lets you chat with Darth Vader using generative AI speech [Eurogamer]10·1 month agoHonestly, a few years ago when ChatGPT was becoming popular, I thought it would be much more common by now to be able to talk to characters in games. Yet here we are in 2025 with existing, quite good voice assistance technology and gaming world does not seem to be particularly interested
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•Chromium Blog: Fighting Unwanted Notifications with Machine Learning in ChromeEnglish51·2 months agoOk, so how can I, as web developer, monitor if my notifications are rejected by this?
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.ml•ChatGPT's hallucination problem is getting worse according to OpenAI's own tests and nobody understands why10·2 months agoIt is literally an algorytm made to hallucinate. The fact that it outputs accurate facts is more of a side effect.
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•Android’s next big feature turns your phone into a desktopEnglish29·2 months agodo you think I am masochist or what, better give me gnu/linux on mobile ;)
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•Several phone brands rumored to be planning a major shift away from AndroidEnglish22·2 months agoPlease, do not post clickbait
vermaterc@lemmy.mlto Technology@lemmy.world•ChatGPT spends 'tens of millions of dollars' on people saying 'please' and 'thank you', but Sam Altman says it's worth itEnglish24·2 months agoWow, have they just realised that not every single thing computers do is actually useful to anyone? I think screens that show things when nobody’s looking cost a lot more on a global scale.
Naah, boring
So… the US government doesn’t have to fund it anymore? So that is an advantage for them in this situation, what is the disadvantage? Or was that their goal all along?
Forgejo is such a terrible name 🙄
This should also be part of git repo (but maybe not downloaded through typical git clone as it might be too large though). Has developers of git ever considered doing this?
I’m ok with auto generated content, but only if it is clearly separated from human generated content, can be disabled at any time and writing main articles with AI is forbidden