This is called taking the Lord’s name in vain. But they tell people that’s saying omg

His wife is being punished for a mistake her mother made when she was a child. You’re not really taking the high road here hoping the same things happen to her kids.

The wapo really is just a mouthpiece for trump now absolutely no push back

In fact when guiding her with tech, I hate the way she calls herself stupid and slow when she makes mistakes.

In my experience these are the users who are the most independent and it always makes me feel bad when they have a silly issue so I try telling them how dumb users can really get.

Marines aren’t national guard, correct. That’s why he’s sent both.

I mean, if it wasnt legal then we wouldn’t have been able to do it to enforce school desegregation decades ago.

Those weren’t marines.

Where are the assholes who told me da’s and judges aren’t cops?

suspended

So we just making shit up to make it make sense now?

Not allowed to go camping unless you’re a citizen I guess

The reason they give for shooting ambulances is that Hamas has used ambulances to move soldiers.

If you were calling Israel hypocrites you should have added something to the end of this sentence because it reads like you’re saying Hamas did it and then attempted to provide an example. Text based sarcasm requires a bit more effort if you don’t want to be misunderstood.

Reading comprehension ain’t for everyone

Edit just in case you think you read it right here sky news on the war crime https://news.sky.com/story/idf-admits-serious-offence-after-using-vehicle-marked-ambulance-in-raid-in-which-a-grandmother-was-killed-13288120

Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Guessing you were thinking of Saving Silverman?

win fake internet points?

Don’t even get those here

It’s the skin chart thing again. Pale skin is far right while brown skin is [religious] extremist.

In several instances dating back to the start of his Senate campaign in 2022, the vice president has explicitly said that a second-term Trump should defy the courts — even the U.S. Supreme Court — if they stand in the way of him exercising executive authority in ways he deems fit.

Yet we’re only hearing about this interview once he’s in power?

Considering the constitution should have prevented his candidacy altogether I wouldn’t hold my breath on other laws keeping him in check.

IDK dog if this many people misunderstood my point I’d be trying better not doubling down on blaming them but you do you

Cite a case or GTFO

about how meta was blocking conservatives

Because those are the literal words you used?