The teen girl was stabbed 28 times in a meticulously planned daytime attack.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    lift reporting restrictions

    bad angle shot: we’re gonna know who this is when two children who knew Ghey disappear, and the idea that children can just be disappeared by the government without any transparency scares the shit out of me. I really hope they allow these kids and their (well-deserved) fate to be entered into the public record. I understand anonymity to protect people who’ve not been convicted of a crime but now that we know that they gleefully conspired to brutally murder someone just because they thought they could get away with it and wanted to know what it felt like, what are we actually protecting?

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Of course people who know these people personally already know who it is. Not releasing the names of minors accused of crimes is standard practice in the US, too. It happens when minors are tried as adults, though, meaning they get sentences that last beyond 18 years of age. I’m not super familiar with UK practices but I’d expect they will release the names for a crime this serious, and since apparently they’re getting decades in prison it doesn’t really matter.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        that’s the thing, the article says that at sentencing the judge “would decide whether to lift reporting restrictions so that the killers could be named.”

        That implies that people can be arrested, charged, tried, sentenced and imprisoned, potentially for their whole lives, under a veil of secrecy. That’s gross and scary.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, so they might not reveal it even if they are sentenced as adults to life. That’s a good point. And also true that the public could figure it out anyway from people who know the families involved.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            that’s what the article seems to imply, and that’s the scary part, but I’m not a lawyer and I’m certainly not a british lawyer so idk if there’s some statute somewhere that says this all becomes public when they reach the age of majority or some other protection in place.

            • squiblet@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not sure how much of a difference it makes whether the public knows their names. It’s not like their parents aren’t going to know and can’t tell people or lawyers, and they’d be the only ones who could really do anything if it was a shady situation.