• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    No, they didn’t.

    Yes. They did.

    The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech.

    Yes, I got that. My point (once again) is no one thinks it is illegal, which makes the argument it a strawman (ie: arguing against a point no one is making).

    No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung

    Oh look, another strawman.

    Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.

    I’m really not sure what this is supposed to mean in this context. I didn’t “make it a thing”. It was “made a thing” by whoever decided to sing it, the people who were upset by it, the article that was published, and the person replying to the article before I even knew it took place.

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Oh look, someone trying to stir up a dumb argument on the internet because they need attention.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, that’s definitely what’s happening. I need attention from anonymous strangers on the internet. 🤦‍♂️ It’s definitely not that someone had a bad take. Deny deny deny.