• SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to mention, if she was diagnosed with something severe, she would probably lose her job if not her entire career. A lot of people avoid seeking help for that reason.

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy to say from where we sit. Harder when that job is what’s keeping a roof over your head and food on your table.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but she was compulsively murdering babies in the hospital. Can we all agree that she shouldn’t have had a job as a nurse in a NICU? That doesn’t feel like a statement with room for debate.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            But… The comment is about why the murderer perhaps didn’t seek mental health. Because she didn’t want to lose her job. Who is saying that this was a good job for her to have?!

            • floatingcloudsoverdawnskies@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The other dumb fucks pushing the issue for whatever reason. I’m trying to figure out why it’s so important for them for everyone else to submit to their opinion that the murderer was mentally ill. What difference would it even make? She’d be a threat to the community regardless and so her imprisonment or execution would be justified whether she was mentally ill or not, so what’s the deal, I wonder?

              • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The point is that if she had had help before she started killing babies, we wouldn’t even be here.

                But she didn’t. We may never know why in her case, but in other cases, fear of losing your job and having no way to afford food, housing, or other needs is one reason.

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because people always look for answers. The other explanation would be “some people are just evil” which is irrational, unscientific, sounds like religious bs and gives no room for change.

                • soursugar@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There are any number of explanations that could apply. You’re presenting a false dichotomy between “mental illness” and “some people are just evil” because you’re looking to silence opinions you do not agree with, and you don’t have a right to do that. What if there’s a different reason? What if she was blackmailed or brainwashed? What if it was part of her religion? What if someone paid her off to do it? Your mind jumped immediately to mental illness, a mindset that stigmatizes the mentally ill. You cannot call yourself good or just when you do that.

                  The truth is that some people really are just evil and they do stuff like this because they’re sadistic, or entitled, or because they think they can do what they want with impunity. You being unable to accept that fact doesn’t make it not true, and that answer not sounding pleasant to you doesn’t make it false either. No one’s obligated to give a baby murderer room for change; they’re allowed to put the well-being of children and the community above hers.

                  It sounds like you’re just mad because other people are rightfully mad at her and want to see her punished, and you can’t see what’s wrong with that. You legitimately don’t understand that it’s not right to morally condemn others for wanting to excise someone like her from the community – an act hardwired in most social animals to protect their safety and the safety of the group, including humans. Maybe the one who’s mentally ill here isn’t her, it’s you.

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    For someone demanding tolerance you are awfully intolerant towards differing opinions.

                    Being sadistic, entititled, or thinking you are above everyone else can all be the result of someone’s mental illness.

                    I do not believe in good and evil, not a religious person. While the transition is gradual, we normally understand a physical and psychological alteration as an “illness” when it causes the affected person pain / discomfort / limitation or when it makes living in current society close to impossible.

                    Wanting to kill babies certainly fits that definition. Whether she was actually brainwashed or mindcontrolled by aliens, we do not know. But additional possibilities don’t rule out mental illness as an option.

                    I also didn’t meant to give the option to change to the murderer, but that there is the possibility for humans to get rid of murderers, for example, when we find a way to cure all kinds of extreme mental illnesses.

        • fabulousflamingos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So a baby murderer should have been allowed to keep her job and continue to put innocent lives in danger because you 1) baselessly think she’s mentally ill, and 2) think that a condition as extreme as you’re implying shouldn’t be regarded with consequence.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok, but she shouldn’t have had her job.

        Of course not, but that’s not looking at it from the perspective of her mental illness.

        From her point of view, keeping her job was likely a high priority.

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So weird that private medical info is only like sorta private except if they wanna use it

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, on the one hand I agree.

        On the other hand, if you dream of murdering babies or crashing planes, perhaps the hospital or airline you work for should be informed.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Real talk though, you can’t punish thought crimes.

          Who TF dreams of crashing planes that does not fly planes? The incidence of plane-crash-dreamers is most certainly highly concentrated amongst pilots.

          As are those who dream of killing babies concentrated around those who spend time around them.

          Most of us use our brains to filter out things that we don’t want to come to actualization. But the bad thoughts are in there. 94% of us will experience intrusive thoughts at some point in our lives. All to jail?

          • egressesatdawn@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And yet you think people should have their guns taken away for their thoughts or their words, so what makes you think you’re any better?

            But the bad thoughts are in there. 94% of us will experience intrusive thoughts at some point in our lives. All to jail?

            Imagine treating intrusive thoughts and killing babies as somehow equivalent. And that psychologists aren’t trained to know the difference and who to flag, and who not to. At least that’s what you’d say when pushing for red flag laws.

        • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or like get it solved before it becomes a problem? And have a professional medical opinion reccomend if you should work somewhere to not based on a risk assessment, not just a blanket statement

          • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, but the alternative is knowing a nurse directly in charge of infants wants to murder them and still letting her go into work. You’re basically an accomplice at that point.

      • itsyourmom@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every mental health professional I have seen over the years is a mandatory reporter (in the US). Meaning they stated to me, upfront… if you have thoughts of hurting others OR yourself that WILL be reported. I didn’t have those thoughts so I probably put that out of my mind rather quickly.

        But after reading these comments, and the articles I can see both sides of the argument. Those suffering from these thoughts may well feel scared to admit them knowing they would have consequences for their jobs/ or legal trouble from admitting them. I’ve no idea who they would be “reporting” it to. I assume the mental health worker would attempt to send the individual to a psychiatric hospital so they can get help .

    • DrPop@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t there protections for that though? That may fall under some medical status protection. Also when diagnosed you also get medicine which may help your brain balance.

    • themajesticdodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not the right time. Not the right place.

      This woman murdered a lot of babies. Your comment is wildly inappropriate.