Nearly four years after George Floyd suffocated to death while being pinned face down to the pavement by a police officer, Minnesota Democrats are fast-tracking legislation that would undo a less-than-year-old ban prohibiting school-based cops from using that same type of restraint on students.

As early as Monday, the state’s House of Representatives is slated to consider a proposal that presents a drastic departure from provisions approved by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz — rules that explicitly barred school resource officers from using face-down “prone restraint.”

The ban was part of a broader police reform movement that followed Floyd’s murder. The fatal physical hold led to the largest civil rights protest in U.S. history, a national reckoning on racism, policy reforms that sought to address police brutality and, in Minneapolis and dozens of districts nationwide, the removal of sworn officers from school campuses. In Minnesota, new state rules barred police officers from using chokeholds on people and prone restraints were banned in the state’s prisons.

Now, as the state’s Democrats make a 180-degree turn on the campus reform, education equity advocates have accused state leaders of falling to the political pressure of law enforcement groups ahead of a November election where party lawmakers seek to maintain their narrow majority in the state House. The proposal cleared the House Ways and Means committee earlier this week.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240304131847/https://www.the74million.org/article/minnesota-dems-push-to-repeal-school-ban-on-restraint-that-killed-george-floyd/

  • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The Democratic Party is a neoliberal political party. Anything to the left is the rare exception.

      • thesilverpig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        unfortunately the democratic rank and file seem to have a humiliation kink cause the party heads keep humiliating their base and the base keeps voting for them.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s not really how it works…

          Party leadership is decided by an open vote of about 450 people/organizations.

          Some is elected officials like president, senator, and a shit ton of mayors. Some political organizations, ex Members, random ass people who are usually donors

          But it’s an open vote, and the people running usually cutthroat.

          So if you don’t toe the party line, the party might not support you later.

          That’s when they do get to vote. There was like 30 years where no vote was held, people were just appointed.

          The system is way more fucked up than most people realize. And it’s designed to hold onto all their power while presenting the illusion of democracy